If Hillary Clinton becomes president, Karisa Johns Smith says she “will probably cry.” Smith, a so-called “Jesus feminist” and doctoral candidate at Wheaton College, views a future President Hillary Clinton as an exemplary model for the next generation of women. “There’s finally somebody for my daughters,” Smith told Christianity Today managing editor Katelyn Beaty, “ — that you grow up believing you can be what you see.”
If our next president is going to be a woman, I would want someone who would inspire our daughters to live with integrity and honor. Hillary does the exact opposite.
But, if our next president is going to be a woman, I would want someone who would inspire our daughters to live with integrity and honor. Hillary does the exact opposite. As Helen Wickert, CEO of courageousmotherhood.net, wrote in an open letter to Hillary last week: “(Y)ou have shown not only my daughter but all daughters — and not only in this country but globally — that in order to, in your words, ‘shatter the glass ceiling,’ you have to lie, cheat, abuse, insult, bully, and ignore. You threaten others along with disrespecting yourself.”
Hillary Clinton is arguably the worst candidate to ever win the presidential nomination of a major U.S. political party (though in fairness, Donald Trump may be a close second). From her lies and inaction surrounding Benghazi to her “extremely careless” mishandling of classified national secrets on her private email server, she should be headed for the political graveyard; instead, she may be headed for the White House.
Her staying power communicates to our daughters that character doesn’t matter — only power, manipulation and money do. This is why even some secular, progressive women, especially those under 30, refuse to support Hillary Clinton. In the New Hampshire primary, for example, Bernie Sanders won 53% of the female vote, and an astonishing 80% of the vote among women under 30. As one Bernie supporter, 25-year-old Gemma Soldati, said in an article published in Quartz: “When my mother says she’s going to vote for Hillary Clinton because she’s a woman, to me that is identity politics at its worst. It’s putting the value of a female president over the value of a president with your values.”
Her staying power communicates to our daughters that character doesn’t matter — only power, manipulation and money do.
Ironically, “Jesus feminists” urge Christians to ignore gender differences when it comes to sex roles, and readily quote Paul’s words that in Christ, “there is no male or female.” Yet, when it comes to voting, some of these same people allow gender to trump everything else. As 26-year-old Ellen Richard, an editor at a Christian publisher in Chicago, told Beaty: “I vote for Clinton less because she’s Hillary Clinton and honestly because she’s a woman.” She added that she’s motivated by a commitment “to seeing women gain greater levels of power,” saying that Hillary’s presidency would balance “a historical wrong.”
This attitude may be prevalent among feminists, Christian and non-Christian, but it has nothing to do with Jesus. Yes, Jesus upheld the dignity of women, but he never encouraged his followers to seek earthly power or to try and even the score. This is not the kind of feminism I want to pass on to my daughter. But, it is definitely the kind of feminism that Hillary Clinton exemplifies — one that seeks personal advancement and will step on anyone, including women, to achieve its goals.
Hillary Clinton is a woman whose husband stands accused of sexually assaulting or raping 14 women. And, though Hillary publicly espoused that “every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported,” she has done the exact opposite. Over the years, Hillary has intimidated, berated and led smear campaigns against the victims of her husband Bill.
Juanita Broaddrick, whom Bill allegedly raped in 1978, recently tweeted: “I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73 . . . it never goes away.” Similarly, private investigator Ivan Duda told author Edward Klein that Hillary hired him in the early 80s “to get rid of all these b—-es (Bill) is seeing. . . . I want you to give me the names and addresses and phone numbers, and we can get them under control.”
In the 1990s, when Gennifer Flowers surfaced and alleged a long affair with Bill, Hillary reportedly launched the “aggressive, explicit direction of the campaign to discredit” Flowers. Similarly, when news broke that Bill had engaged in sexual relations with White House intern, Monica Lewinsky, Hillary called Lewinsky a “narcissistic loony toon,” and attributed the entire affair to a “vast Right-wing conspiracy.”
Hillary Clinton purports to champion women, but in actuality, she betrays them — and so does her brand of feminism.
But, the brand of feminism Hillary supports upholds careerism as the highest good — and encourages mothers to sacrifice their own progeny on this idolatrous altar. To Hillary, the number-one thing women want is unfettered freedom to pursue their careers. So, she boldly advances government-subsidized childcare, equal pay, and abortion throughout all nine months.
This feminist agenda was quite evident in last week’s Democratic National Convention. Though prior conventions have referred to abortion euphemistically, this last one actually celebrated it. It featured Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, shouting her abortion to the applause and cheers of the audience. “To succeed in life, all we need are the tools . . .” Hogue asserted. And, what are those tools? — Abortion on demand, so we, like her, can kill our unborn children when we find ourselves pregnant at the “wrong time.” Similarly, Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, gushed at a convention party about the joys of “being on a stage where we can now talk openly about how abortion is a right.”
We’ve come a long way baby. Every year, we kill more than one-million of our unborn babies. More than 60% of our children under five are in childcare. But, to feminists like Hillary, it’s all good because women now earn 76% of a man’s median salary, as opposed to 59% 40 years ago.
But, it’s not good — not for us and not for our daughters. Two leading, American economists have been tracking women’s happiness over the past several decades. And, what they’ve found is that as we women have won all these supposed gains, our happiness has actually dropped. In the 70s, women actually rated their overall life satisfaction higher than men. But since then, our happiness scores have declined, while men’s scores have stayed about the same. Now, we are actually less happy than our male counterparts.
If we truly care about the next generation of women, we should oppose Hillary Clinton, not support her.
Hillary Clinton belittles stay-at-home mothers, once quipping that instead of pursuing a career, “I suppose I could have stayed home, baked cookies and had teas.” This is a woman who knows nothing of healthy femininity nor the importance of motherhood, and will do nothing to promote it. She will simply continue to claw her way to the top, victimize those who oppose her, and advance policies that weaken the family.
So, if we truly care about the next generation of women, we should oppose Hillary Clinton, not support her. A Hillary presidency will not help our daughters; her example will poison their view of womanhood and lead them to a bleaker, not brighter, tomorrow.