Archbishop of Canterbury
Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, (Photo Credit: World Council of Churches)

Anglican Church Announces Opposition to NDAs; Abuse Survivors Call for More

By Jackson Elliott

The Archbishop of Canterbury—the senior leader of all Anglican churches worldwide—announced Tuesday that the Anglican Church will no longer support non-disclosure agreements.

Archbishop Justin Welby told Times Radio that non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) have been used to hide racism, but said nothing of NDAs hiding abuse—a practice abuse survivors claim is rampant. Welby added that he has written to several senior leaders in the church to tell them that the Church of England will no longer use confidentiality agreements.

“I have said many times that I am totally against NDAs,” Welby said. “NDAs are unacceptable.”

According to Elizabeth Henry, the church’s former race relations adviser, a man of African descent was given a picture of his head photoshopped onto a banana with the words “Banana Man” written under it. Human Resources claimed the image wasn’t racist, and the man left the church’s employment after signing an NDA.

Henry, who recently left the church of England, said that there are other cases where minorities in the church have left because of racism after signing NDAs.

Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Fractured Faith: Finding Your Way Back to God in an Age of Deconstruction” To donate, click here.

Abuse survivors say NDAs have also been used in the Anglican Church to keep abuse secret.

For example, in 2018, Anglican leaders forced a woman, abused by a vicar who had exposed himself to her, to sign an NDA.

Welby said nothing about that case. He also did not address whether NDAs have impacted the hundreds of people who were sexually abused by Anglican church leaders from the 1940s to 2018.

According to a report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, the church prioritized its own reputation and that of abusers over safeguarding children. 

Most of the time, NDAs are secret, said Anglican Church abuse survivor Lee Furney. Furney is planning a worldwide campaign titled #NDAfree, which he hopes will end the misuse of NDAs in Christian organizations.

Lee Furney
Abuse survivor Lee Furney

“We’re committed to supporting individuals and organizations to break free of the pervasive culture of NDAs,” a letter explaining the campaign reads.

Furney says he experienced abuse from Anglican leader Jonathan Fletcher, who allegedly spent 30 years abusing young men who attended Fletcher’s church and youth camps Fletcher ran. (Welby worked as a dormitory officer at one of Fletcher’s camps.)

“For Welby to be shocked by (the use of NDAs in the Anglican Church) shows that he’s at best out of touch,” said Furney. “I would be shocked if nobody has complained to Lambeth Palace about NDAs before and for him to have realized there’s a problem.”

NDAs have been used to hide sexual abuse, financial abuse, and other sorts of misconduct, he said. They harm victims again by denying justice and keeping them from healing.

Senior editor for WORLD Magazine, Mindy Belz, wrote in a 2019 article that “done right,” NDAs can “help institutions protect members’ privacy and can fend off ruinous litigation.” But she adds that NDAs “can also mask institutional disease and leader misconduct.”

New Testament scholar Scot McKnight calls NDAs “profoundly evil,” noting that they essentially hide sin in exchange for money.

“No one with a theologically-informed ethic should be thinking of non-disparagement agreements when the issue is dirt on the floor in the church,” he said. “It is never right to hide a sin for money.”

NDAs are almost always suggested by the stronger party with something to hide, McKnight added. Often, the institution ambushes, bullies, or intimidates the victim into signing.

Furney agrees. “(NDAs) compound the pain,” he said. “One of the most healing things for any abuse victim is to be able to tell your story.”

Though NDAs are legally binding, Forbes magazine reports that “there needs to be a balance of power” for them to be enforceable. Specifically, NDAs used to prevent people from reporting harassment or abuse to the proper authorities cannot be enforced, the article stated.

Yet according to Furney, the threat of legal action is often enough to silence victims, who don’t have the money or strength for a long court battle.

“It puts victims in a very difficult situation,” Furney said. “Do you want to be the test case that works out whether these things hold water?”

Large institutions with deep pocketbooks often have employees sign NDAs. Willow Creek and Ravi Zacharias International Ministries have reportedly used NDAs to cover up wrongdoing.

Welby cannot order churches to act, but his statement on NDAs creates significant pressure for the church to change, Furney said. Victims who resist signing an NDA can now do so knowing that their church’s highest leader backs them.

To really fix the problem, though, Furney said Welby must demand that leaders disclose NDAs that are currently in force and demand that leaders rescind them.

“If he really wanted to go a step further there would be an exposure of the churches that have used this dark method,” said Furney. “That would actually be very effective.”

Jackson ElliottJackson Elliott is a Christian journalist trained at Northwestern University. He has worked at The Daily Signal, The Inlander, and The Christian Post, covering topics ranging from D.C. politics to prison ministry. His interests include the Bible, philosophy, theology, Russian literature, and Irish music.



Keep in touch with Julie and get updates in your inbox!

Don’t worry we won’t spam you.

More to explore

10 thoughts on “Anglican Church Announces Opposition to NDAs; Abuse Survivors Call for More”

  1. This is good: but not only does it need to go further, but injured people also need to stand their ground and refuse to sign them.

    Is it the case that people feel obliged to sign these things, in exchange for a (good) parting reference?

    It’s far better to walk away and to retain the right to speak out, no matter what, than to be muzzled.

    The Lord will always provide – reference or no reference. Well, he certainly did for me, anyway, when I had to leave a long-term rental property without a reference, owing to taking a stand against landlord misbehaviour.

    It’s a matter of being courageous, and exercising faith for His provision.

  2. Wow a church leader that actually believes in actual transparency. I bet the evangelical industrial complex is thinking YIKES transparency it must be of the devil.

  3. If you dig deeper, you may even see a pattern beginning to form. Abuse of the flock by Catholic Priests, Anglican Leaders and Senior Pastors.

  4. Too bad Welby is motivated solely by the racism part. Again, sexual abuse survivors are left out to dry. Makes you wonder about his sincerity or whether he’s being politically correct. I can’t judge his heart.

    1. The Episcopal Church in the US answers to your description, but technically, the Church of England upholds the traditional Christian ethic of marriage, for now. However, there are many places in Africa and Asia in which the Anglican Church is strong, vibrant, and orthodox.

  5. I’m glad the Archbishop said this, but as I understand it, the Archbishop of Canterbury doesn’t really have much power even in England— the Church of England is decentralized and it is the individual church pastors who have the real power. Still I hope he will say that any nondisclosure agreements that are under his authority– which probblay means just Archdiocese employees and maybe the parish of Canterbury Cathedral employees— are no longer of force and anybody who has signed them is now released. It didn’t sound like what he said was precise enough to have that legal force yet.

    And it would be useful if he said that though he doesn’t have the power to legally abrogate an NDA from, say, the parish of Bury St. Edmunds, he will publicly condemn the rector there if the rector ever tries to enforce one.

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people use their full name when commenting. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.

Comments are limited to 300 words.

Leave a Reply

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people register before they begin commenting. This means no anonymous comments will be allowed. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.
MOST popular articles


Hi. We see this is the third article this month you’ve found worth reading. Great! Would you consider making a tax-deductible donation to help our journalists continue to report the truth and restore the church?

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Is it Me? Making Sense of Your Confusing Marriage”