(Opinion) As a survivor who has spoken out on the sexual abuse crisis in evangelical churches, several parts of Megan Basham’s book Shepherds for Sale are troubling to me. Beyond outing an alleged victim, which was both unethical and cruel, the book states that churches implementing policies to protect children is “uncontroversial.”
After nearly two decades advocating for robust safety policies within the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), I can say that I find Basham’s assertion to be misleading.
Specifically, in chapter seven of Shepherds for Sale, Basham states, “The question of how to better protect children was uncontroversial, centering largely on background checks, training in protective processes, and education in reporting to the police.”
An unsuspecting person might read that and think denominations like the SBC have dealt with their problem of clergy who sexually abuse kids. But they haven’t. Not at all.
Sure, everyone says they want to protect children. But actually doing it is where things stall.
Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Donate $75 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you can elect to receive the “Reimagine Church” 2-Book Bundle including ‘Invisible Jesus’ by Scot McKnight & Tommy Phillips and ‘Need to Know’ edited by Danielle Strickland. To donate, click here.
Since 2006, I’ve been urging the SBC to establish a panel of independent experts to assess clergy sex abuse reports and a centralized database of clergy who have been credibly accused.
Numerous other survivors and advocates have urged the same thing, but to date, the SBC has failed to create either a panel or database.
Apparently, protecting children is quite controversial. Meanwhile, abusers are given free rein.
According to Child USA, a think-tank dedicated to child abuse prevention, the average age someone abused as a child reports the abuse is 52. This delayed disclosure is part of the harm done by the profound trauma.
This reflects my own story of abuse decades ago by a pastor in a Southern Baptist church in Texas, which I recently recounted in my memoir, Baptistland.
The harmful pattern of abuse, shame, and cover-up
As a 16-year-old girl, I was repeatedly raped by the youth pastor at my church. After this went on for months, he began to tell me that I harbored Satan. This was absolutely terrifying to me.
In hindsight, I think that’s exactly what the youth pastor wanted: to put this enormous, exponentially greater shame onto me, so that I would not talk about it.
Somehow, even in that state of fear, I ended up telling the music minister at that church what had happened. He told me to never again speak of it. And the youth pastor moved on to a bigger church.
For 35 years, I kept silent, accepting the shame that rightly belonged to my rapist. Such patterns of cover-up have ramifications. By the time a person brings forward a report of childhood abuse, the time limit for criminal prosecution has often passed due to the statute of limitations.
Since most child sex abusers are never criminally prosecuted, this means their deeds won’t show up in a background check.
This is why an institutional system of ascertaining credible allegations is so important. A database of those criminally convicted and those with credible reports against them can prevent a potential abuser from church-hopping to new prey.
It won’t bring justice by putting that person behind bars. But it can at least prevent those who are credibly accused from continuing to carry the mantle of trust that the pastorate confers.
Why third-party assessment is essential
As I read Basham’s analysis in Shepherds for Sale, it appears to me that she is mistakenly thinking that an independent third party to assess clergy sex abuse allegations would be primarily to assess allegations about abuse of adult congregants.
In my reading of her chapter on abuse, Basham spends significant space on cases involving allegations against former SBC president Johnny Hunt and comedian John Crist, and one involving another female survivor—all adults.
But countless cases involving allegations about child sexual abuse also need independent assessment. These cases have been outside the justice system in large part because of short statutes of limitation for criminal prosecution (and because civil statute of limitations reforms haven’t yet been enacted in many states).
In the Houston Chronicle’s landmark Abuse of Faith series, several reporters, including Robert Downen, documented over 700 victims—almost all of whom were children at the time of the abuse. To act as though the SBC’s clergy sex abuse problem is centered primarily on the abuse of adults is misleading.
Countless kids, boys and girls, have had their lives absolutely decimated—both by the sexual abuse itself and by the faith group’s recalcitrance and cruelty in dealing with it.
Again, this reflects my own experience. In the early 2000s, when I broke my silence and confronted my childhood church with what had happened, I thought they would do the right thing. But instead, they attacked me.
Though it was profoundly painful, ultimately, they failed to stop me from speaking out. Similarly, many other survivors have also spoken, year after year, about why institutional protections matter for the safeguarding of children.
The need to listen well and frame the issue correctly
One of the best ways to protect church kids in the future is for church and denominational leaders to listen to those who are attempting to tell about abuse in the past.
But the SBC still has no effective system for institutionally listening to reports of abuse.
Though many survivors have come forward in recent years—often at enormous personal cost—they have often been met with institutional stonewalling.
Families with children in Southern Baptist churches need to be aware of these egregious safety gaps. Instead, many of the loudest voices frame clergy sex abuse in ways that seem to diminish the severity and urgency of the crisis.
For example, chapter seven of Shepherds for Sale, titled “#MeToo, #ChurchToo, and an Apocalypse,” includes few if any voices of abuse survivors or experts in this field. (One exception is Basham, who says she is an abuse survivor herself.)
Instead, Basham opens with about eight pages recounting how comedian John Crist was supposedly “canceled” after allegations of abuse involving several young women.
Basham states that Crist—exposed in an investigative article and additional reporting since then—was accused of “emotionally manipulating and harassing women.”
But the focus is on how Crist was “on the cusp of making Christian entertainment history,” which investigative reporting “put an end to”—as if Crist were the victim.
We’re not going to be quiet
Today, the SBC is still failing to prioritize the protection of children. The denomination—and Basham, as well—appear far more concerned with protecting the careers of clergymen and, apparently, Christian comedians too.
So, in the nation’s largest Protestant denomination, has it ever been “uncontroversial” to implement policies to better protect children? Shockingly, it remains extremely controversial.
Recently, Philip Robertson, the newly elected chair of the SBC’s Executive Committee, even tried to discredit and sow doubt about the Abuse of Faith series. And the SBC’s new president, Clint Pressley, made clear that he is “not in favor” of a database that would list abusive church leaders.
But just as I’ve done for 18 years, I will continue publicly advocating for the SBC to establish a database of clergy sex abusers so they can’t church-hop. I’ll also continue urging independent assessments and shared record-keeping, so that congregations can be warned about those credibly accused of sexually abusing minors.
And no matter how recalcitrant the SBC may be, I will continue to speak out, because families deserve to know the truth about the SBC’s irresponsible lack of safeguards for protecting children against predatory pastors.
Many other survivors have joined me and will also continue. There’s no going back. I hope you’ll join us in this effort because, regardless of what Meg Basham says, we still have so very far to go to make children safer.
This commentary does not necessarily reflect the views of The Roys Report.
Christa Brown is the author of Baptistland: A Memoir of Abuse, Betrayal, and Transformation and This Little Light: Beyond a Baptist Preacher Predator and His Gang. Christa, who is a retired appellate attorney, a mom, and a grandma, lives with her husband in Colorado.
Editor’s note: Earlier this summer, Christa Brown was featured on The Roys Report Podcast discussing her story and insights on abuse in the SBC. Click below to listen or watch.
13 Responses
This is why an institutional system of ascertaining credible allegations is so important. A database of those criminally convicted and those with credible reports against them can prevent a potential abuser from church-hopping to new prey.
True, but can we trust the institutions to do it?
The author pointed out months ago how poorly the SBC has been at the task:
Hundreds of “unique submissions” have been made to the hotline — they’ve told us this much. Yet we still know nothing at all about who those reported pastors are. Nor do we know whether congregants in the reported pastors’ churches have been fully informed.
SBC officials don’t release even basic data. How many independent investigations have been initiated based on hotline reports? How many reported pastors have been placed on leave pending investigation? None of this is transparent.
What we do know is that, in the 21 months since the hotline’s inception, not a single abusive pastor’s name has been added to any SBC database. Not one. The hotline has not yet resulted in the institutional outing of any abusive SBC pastors.
https://baptistnews.com/article/about-that-sbc-sexual-abuse-hotline-it-just-gets-worse/
We need warriors of the faith such as yourself. Blessings.
This book was endorsed by John MacArthur, a man with a history of supporting pedophiles.
Thank you Christa, for being courageous and living with integrity, as you share about this important issue in church life. As a former pastor of 20 years, I have seen time and again how the church and church system have no interest in proactive transparency and accountability for pastors or predators who groom and abuse children in the church. And when I spoke up repeatedly, about an admitted pedophile, my senior pastor wanted me fired for being insubordinate. Pedophiles need at least two key components: #1. They need adults in denial – and thus, they are easily groomed by the pedophile to see them as trustworthy/a good guy, and #2. They need access to children. And sad to say, “church” is a perfect playground for pedophiles, because these pedophiles/predators understand that the church has NO intention of creating a database and being a strong, consistent voice for the victim, with clear boundaries and accountability and follow through.
I agree with Megan Basham – that the solution is at the individual church level. The sexual abuse of children should be reported to law enforcement upon immediately finding out. They are equipped to investigate and move forward with prosecution. Churches should run background checks of their workers and volunteers who work with children. There are churches in the SBC that are doing this right now.
Recent stats reveal that 58% of SBC churches report using background checks on staff and volunteers, though it varies by area of the country. 42% not even doing this basic step is concerning. All from Lifeway Research: https://julieroys.com/survey-most-southern-baptist-churches-use-background-checks-fewer-receive-abuse-training/
Even more concerning, only 36% of SBC churches say they’ve training staff and volunteers on reporting sexual abuse (even though people in such positions are mandated reporters in most states.) And only 16% of SBC churches report any sort of training about caring for sexual abuse survivors.
It seems that Christa Brown is correct that there’s a long way to go in protecting children.
I’m surprised at these statistics. I pastored Baptist churches in two different Canadian associations, where I was responsible for over ten years for the training and vetting (with police checks) all our volunteers. It would have been impossible to get insurance for the church’s ministries without such a program in place, and reporting of suspected abuse is a legal requirement, at least in the province of Ontario.
Churches seek to hide abuse allegations because they fear public knowledge of scandalous behavior on the part of church leaders will spark an exodus of congregants which will in turn lead to a decline in revenue. It’s so very simple.
Thank you, Christa Brown, for telling the truth.
Thank you continually speaking truth to power. Your efforts are immeasurably valuable.
I think Christa has missed Megan’s point. Megan didn’t seem to be agreeing that everything that should be done was being done but rather that the current processes were too limited and therefore needed to be reexamined.
Sexual abuse of a minor or an adult is a criminal offense and the perpetrator should be reported to the police and a trial held. Anyone in the church standing in the way of that process is also breaking laws and should also be arrested and have a day in court. The churches will never self-police. Victims must go to the police, and usually the story will get out there through the press. That’s God’s way of bringing our sins into the light.
Some don’t like what I say but here is fact from being in law enforcement for 27 1/2 years. The KILLERS GANG MEMBERS CARTEL MEMBERS IN PRISON HAVE MORE MORALS WHEN IT COMES TO THE SAFETY IF CHILDREN THAN MOST CHRISTIAN RIGHT PASTORS OR MEN. You see they have one rule no one hurts children and if you did you will eventually get shanked. That’s their rules. They already took justice against Derrick Chauvin who killed Floyd. Thank God a guard intervened. A Gang leader stabbed him 22 times and Chauvin’s life was saved by the guard. I’m still waiting to hear if JOSHY DUGGAR gets shanked. Joshy has already made bad blood with his fellow inmates. Hopefully they will leave him alone.
So please help me Joe to understand what you are saying. Prison inmates have more morals than conservative pastors because they are willing to be vigilantes? Because they are willing to murder people?