Robert Morris, the controversial founder of Gateway Church, has asked a Dallas County court to dismiss a $1 million defamation lawsuit from Cindy Clemishire. Morris’s motion to dismiss comes just weeks after the embattled pastor pleaded guilty to sexually abusing Clemishire in the 1980s, starting when she was 12 years old.
His motion argues that Clemishire’s lawsuit is solely a religious matter and shouldn’t be up for debate in the courts. However, Clemishire’s lawyer argued in response that her case deals with a crime, which is a secular matter.
Clemishire, along with her father, Jerry Lee Clemishire, archivado the lawsuit in June. She alleges that Morris and Gateway church leaders on June 14, 2024, publicly dismissed the pastor’s abuse as merely a “moral failure” involving a “young lady,” instead of the sexual assault of a child.
She also contends Morris and church leadership made “knowingly false” statements about her that minimized the crime after media reports surfaced that same year.
Clemishire, now 55, said she is seeking accountability from the Dallas megachurch’s leadership.
Your tax-deductible gift supports our mission of reporting the truth and restoring the church. Donate $50 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you can elect to receive “Gods of the Smoke Machine” by Scott Latta, haga clic aquí.
Morris was sentenced to six months in jail in early October — a light sentence stemming from a plea deal that also required Morris to register as a sex offender and pay $270,000 in restitution.
Clemishire’s claims fall under church autonomy, Morris argues
The crux of the motion is that Clemishire’s lawsuit deals with church matters, over which the court has no jurisdiction.
Clemishire’s claims, the motion contends, go against the legal definition of religious freedom known as the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine. This doctrine prevents secular civil courts from weighing in on a religious organization’s operations and governance.
The doctrine stems from the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, stating that courts can’t resolve religious questions and instead should defer to the religious entity’s authority.
The motion said that Clemishire’s claims about Gateway Church’s words require the court to go “behind the ‘ecclesiastical curtain’ to determine the veracity of what church officials said.”
Gateway Church, which is also named in the lawsuit, had previously requested to dismiss the case under the same doctrine in August. Last week, it filed an additional brief in support of its motion.
“While the First Amendment does not bar all claims against churches, (Clemishire’s) claims against Gateway here plainly fall within the sphere of church autonomy,” Gateway argued in its recent brief. The church noted that the statements of leadership fall under constitutionally protected internal communications.
The church asked the court to dismiss the case “with prejudice,” which would prevent the case from being refiled.
Morris’ wife Deborah and several current and former Gateway elders, who are also named as defendants, all deny the allegations in their own filings.
In an Oct. 31 hearing, Ron Breaux, the attorney representing Gateway, noted that while “the abuse was horrific,” and “tragic,” this case is “not about that abuse,” according to KERA, the PBS affiliate for the Dallas area.
Bill Mateja, the attorney for Morris, echoed Breaux.
“The doctrine is all about protecting the First Amendment, that the courts and that the government shouldn’t get into the affairs of the church,” Mateja said, according to KERA News. “That’s why I just think, fundamentally, it’s a major constitutional issue and the doctrine of the ecclesiastical abstention is founded in the First Amendment.”
Clemishire said lawsuit deals with a crime, not religious doctrine
Clemishire contested Morris and Gateway’s dismissal in a strongly-worded rebuttal filed last week. She said her lawsuit has nothing to do with religious doctrine.
“This case is about the criminal conduct of the former pastor of a church, and the subsequent tortious conduct of the church and some of its leaders after that criminal conduct came to light,” Clemishire wrote. “None of these unlawful acts are protected by the First Amendment.”
Her rebuttal adds that her case isn’t asking the court to “interpret religious doctrine or church discipline. Rather, it is about secular facts — the who, what, when, and where of the false and defamatory statements Defendants made about the Clemishires.”
Clemishire urged that the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine can’t be used to shield churches from accountability for civil wrongs that aren’t connected to theological disputes.
Her lawsuit doesn’t require the court to “second-guess church governance or question any ecclesiastical decision making.”
Clemishire’s attorney, Alex Yaffe, said in a hearing Friday that Clemishire is ready to get dismissal motions thrown out, according to KERA News.
“We are eager to get the procedural matters behind us so we can focus on the facts of the case,” Yaffe, said, according to KERA. “We are anxious for Robert Morris and his accomplices to be held accountable for their actions.”
Dallas County District Court Judge Emily Tobolowsky said she will likely issue a ruling on Morris’s motion sometime this week, according to KERA News.
Gateway Church is also currently contending with a separate financial fraud lawsuit filed by former congregants.
Liz Lykins is a correspondent covering religion news for El Informe Roys, WORLD Magazine, and other publications.
Spanish 
English 
11 Responses
The counsel for the pastor of the Anaheim Vineyard Church successfully argued the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine for the pastor who allegedly stole the church, but I think it’s a Hail Mary to win a defamation case.
The basic principle of the doctrine is to allow the church to govern itself without government interference. So the church is allowed to create its own doctrine and bylaws.
Thus for the principle to apply in the case of plaintiff Cindy Clemishire, there would have to be church bylaws, to which she was subject and had agreed to be governed by, e.g., church membership rules, and those bylaws would have to acceptable to the government.
And so for it to work in this case, Gateway would need bylaws which allowed its leaders to defame its members, and those members would have agreed to allow the leaders to defame them, and the government would have to accept this bylaw as valid, i.e., not allowing the church to do something fundamentally illegal under state law or federal law.
The facts and the law do not support dismissal.
Nevertheless, I still think it’s a difficult defamation case to win. It seems to be more about PR spin than malicious defamation. It was defending Morris more than attacking Cindy as they tried to downplay the seriousness of his conduct.
I realize she suffered a great trauma at the hands of Robert Morris. I can relate because I too was abused by a church elder. However defamation to me is when you say something untrue about a person and I don’t see where he did that. He never called her names or said she did something she didn’t do. I feel this is a way to get more money from him. He’s been convicted and sentenced ; justice has been carried out through our court system and she needs to accept that.
“I feel this is a way to get more money from him.”
This is a very disrespectful comment.
The man is unrepentant and justice has not been done.
I so agree. Robert Morris made millions off Christianity and he’s so unrepentant that he can’t bear to part with a small portion of it to the victim of his most egregious crime. He was greedy in his late 20’s and he’s just as greedy now.
He reminds me of a big fat spider at the end of summer, engorged on the lives of the victims caught in his web.
One can only begin to imagine how grieved God is that Robert Morris is trying to hide behind the “ecclesiastical curtain” to escape the proven crime to which Morris has already pleaded guilty. Sexual crimes by the clergy, especially against minors, were definitely not what the Lord had in mind when He breathed the Gospel into the hearts of the Bible’s individual authors about the ecclesiastical curtain.
The defamation by Robert Morris has occurred dozens, perhaps hundreds, of times Morris tried to escape exposure. The photo of Cindy when she was young, appearing in a previous article, is a reminder of her vulnerability.
I am glad that Cindy’s father has been on her side throughout these many years. I can see how Morris could be charged with violating the sanctity of her pastor father’s home to seduce this child.
Morris is his own worst enemy. His greed has been his undoing. His refusal to pay for his victim’s therapy is what triggered his exposure in the first place. Now he’s trying to hold on to the money the court awarded his victim.
Either the convicted pedophile doesn’t get it or he just doesn’t care.
Mr. Morris, you plead guilty. Now, pay up! … As of 2025, Morris’s net worth is estimated at $117 million. His wealth primarily stems from his role at Gateway Church, book sales, speaking engagements, and media appearances.
When a church can’t “govern itself” and resorts to illegal activity, it’s obviously time for the courts to step in to protect those who are abused under the cover of “the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine.”
There is NO PLACE for sexual abuse in the church. To argue otherwise is to pretend the church is somehow exempt from our judicial system.
It is not. Indeed, our judicial system is designed to protect the vulnerable and those who are trampled on by the powerful regardless of where the abuse takes place.
Shame on anyone who supports any institution, religious or not, that uses its power to cover up horrific sin.
He only has a short stint to serve so with huge attorney fees and no stable income, he must try to hang on to his “standard of living”. After knowing he could not defend himself against Cindy, he reluctantly resigned from his church prior to being arrested. He then demanded the church give him $1 million in a lump sum plus $600,000 to $800,000 annually for a “retirement package” (nice try, “Bob”). There is no secular company in the world that would honor an agreement with an employee if they harmed the company and eventually were convicted of a felony. As far as Cindy, she is in the driver’s seat but, from a biblical perspective, I think she has gotten closure and should probably move on.
“but, from a biblical perspective, I think she has gotten closure and should probably move on”
There is no closure without repentance from the abuser.
I am baffled at why Robert Morris’ family – especially his wife and children – and attorneys will not just ask him to give Cindy the $1million so that some restitution will happen.
Don’t they feel grief at what he did to her?
People who have zero connection to her and never heard of her before (including myself and other Christians), feel grief on her behalf.
On top of it all, we read he is worth $114 *million*!