U.S. Senate Hearing Examines Political Role of Tax-Exempt Organizations

Por Steve Rabey
hearing tax-exempt senate
On May 4, 2022, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) chaired a subcommittee hearing on "Political Activities of Tax Exempt Entities" at the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C. (Video screengrab)

Organizations have abused their tax-exempt status to flood American politics with “a torrent of dark money” totaling more than $1 billion over the past 12 years, said Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., during his opening statement at Wednesday’s tax subcommittee hearing on “Laws and Enforcement Governing the Political Activities of Tax-Exempt Organizations.”

“Special interests began to rig our elections from behind a veil of organizations formed under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code,” said Whitehouse, who is urging the IRS to clarify its rules and step up its prosecution of wrongdoers.

But in his opening statement, Senator John Thune, R-S.D., dijo the IRS has mismanaged past efforts to limit abuse by tax-exempt organizations, failed to “ensure that Americans’ private tax-related information is protected,” and gone after conservative and Tea Party groups because of their “underlying political philosophy.”

Whitehouse disagreed with the claim that conservatives were targeted: “Let me set the record straight — this is false.”

Thune claimed most of the groups abusing their tax-exempt status were liberal, saying, “Fifteen of the most politically active nonprofit organizations that generally align with the Democrat Party spent more than $1.5 billion in 2020 — hundreds of millions of dollars more than a comparable sample group aligned with the Republican Party.”

Give a gift of $30 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “The Way of the Dragon or the Way of the Lamb” by Jamin Goggin and Kyle Strobel. To donate, haga clic aquí.

Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code lists 28 different categories of organizations that are largely exempt from federal income tax, but the tax subcommittee is focusing on potential abuse in these four categories:

— 501(c)(3) charitable organizations, including churches and many religious nonprofits.

— 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations that can lobby for legislation but are prohibited from direct or indirect participation in political campaigns.

— 501(c)(5) labor organizations.

— 501(c)(6) trade associations and business leagues.

MinisterioReloj has reported on problems related to political activity of nonprofit groups, including stories on how donor advised funds such as the National Christian Foundation channel tax-exempt donations to political groups, and how get-out-to-vote organizations such as My Faith Votes claim they are nonpartisan while promoting only Republican candidates.

Politicians from both parties benefit from the abuse of the tax code, but they differ over who’s responsible, claiming that those on the other side are guilty of the greatest abuse. But they agree on one thing: Abuse has skyrocketed since 2010 and the Supreme Court’s controversial Citizens United decision, which according to the Brennan Center for Justice, “reversed century-old campaign finance restrictions and enabled corporations and other outside groups to spend unlimited funds on elections.”

On Wednesday, Ann Ravel, the former chair of the Federal Election Commission, testified that IRS rules and enforcement problems had made matters worse. “Organizations that have tax exempt status are a major source of anonymous large political contributions, because donors are not required to identify themselves either to the IRS or to the public.”

Ravel said the consequences of the 2010 Citizens United decision could be seen in the 2012 election cycle, when “at least $250 million passed through the (c)(4)s into efforts to elect candidates, an 80-fold increase from eight years prior. … Since the IRS rule enacted in 2020 eliminated donor reporting requirements to the IRS, the problem of political dark money has been exacerbated.”

Brad Smith, another former FEC Chair and founder of the Institute for Free Speech, said there are dangers in tougher enforcement because the IRS has an unfortunate history of targeting political opponents with the information groups are forced to disclose to the agency.

Philip Hackney of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law used his testimony to question whether private foundations should retain their preferred tax status because of their history of widespread abuse. 

Scott Walter, president of the Capital Research Center, a conservative organization that focuses on political spending by liberal groups such as the Ford Foundation, says legislators should focus on abuse by 501(c)(3) groups, which supplied a “river of money” worth approximately $20 billion in the 2018 cycle.

“These kinds of political operations by exempt organizations disturb many Americans,” said Walter. “Across the political spectrum, people see exempt organizations enjoying elite power and wealth, and employing it in anti-democratic ways.”

Walter also said 501(c)(3) charities such as My Faith Votes should not be allowed to fund or execute voter registration and get-out-the-vote activities.

“Those activities are only legal now if (c)(3)s carry them out in nonpartisan fashion, but in this age of microtargeting, there is far too high a risk that they will not be carried out in such a fashion,” Walter said.

Senators Whitehouse and Thune have not indicated if the hearing will lead to legislation addressing these challenges.

Esta pieza apareció originalmente en MinisterioReloj.

Steve RabeySteve Rabey es un autor y periodista veterano que ha publicado más de 50 libros y 2000 artículos sobre religión, espiritualidad y cultura. Fue instructor en los seminarios Fuller y Denver y en la Academia de la Fuerza Aérea de EE. UU.

COMPARTIR ESTE:
  •   
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

¡OBTÉN ACTUALIZACIONES POR CORREO ELECTRÓNICO!

¡Manténgase en contacto con Julie y reciba actualizaciones en su bandeja de entrada!

No te preocupes, no te enviaremos spam.

Más para explorar
discusión

El Informe Roys busca fomentar un diálogo reflexivo y respetuoso. Con ese fin, el sitio requiere que las personas usen su nombre completo al comentar. Además, se eliminarán todos los comentarios con blasfemias, insultos y/o un tono desagradable.

Los comentarios están limitados a 300 palabras.

Deja una respuesta

El Informe Roys busca fomentar el diálogo reflexivo y respetuoso. Con ese fin, el sitio requiere que las personas se registren antes de comenzar a comentar. Esto significa que no se permitirán comentarios anónimos. Además, se eliminarán todos los comentarios con blasfemias, insultos y/o un tono desagradable.
 
Artículos MÁS RECIENTES
Artículos MÁS populares
es_MXSpanish

Donar

Hola. Vemos que este es el tercer artículo de este mes que ha encontrado que vale la pena leer. ¡Estupendo! ¿Consideraría hacer una donación deducible de impuestos para ayudar a nuestros periodistas a continuar informando la verdad y restaurar la iglesia?

Su donación deducible de impuestos ayuda a nuestros periodistas a informar la verdad y responsabilizar a los líderes y organizaciones cristianas. Haga una donación de $25 o más a The Roys Report este mes y recibirá una copia de "Sin miedo" de Carey Scott.