María
De Muth

escocés
McKnight

Screenshot 2023-01-13 at 1.50.18 PM

Naghmeh
panahi

‘The Chosen’: Theology Consultant On Adapting Scripture for Biblical Fiction

By Jesse Stone
the chosen jesus
Actor Jonathan Roumie, center, portrays Jesus Christ in season four of the series “The Chosen.” (Photo courtesy of 5&2 Studios)

(Opinion) When providing a theological assessment for “El elegido,” it is essential to keep in mind what the show is and what it is not. The show is not Scripture. This is why the first episode begins with a disclaimer, reminding the audience of this distinction and encouraging them to read the Gospels.

Additionally, it is important to know what sort of show “El elegido” aims to be. It is not a historical documentary but a historical drama. Its primary purpose is not to educate, but to entertain and engage the audience while remaining true to the source material.

“The Chosen” has accumulated hundreds of millions of views across various platforms and has had an enthusiastic fan base since its release in 2017. I serve the creators of the show along with my colleagues by reviewing the content for theological accuracy. Both the subject matter and the source material for the show are held sacred by all of the experts who provide consultation for “The Chosen,” myself included. No one wants to see Jesus, the Gospels, or the Christian faith misrepresented. 

That’s partly a matter of faith and, for me, academic integrity. It’s also part of our mission at Come and See — to introduce the world to the authentic Jesus. “The Chosen” plays a crucial role in that project, which means the Jesus depicted in the series is of paramount importance.

In trying to bring theological accuracy to this show, it’s helpful to think of the content in two categories. First, there is the content that has been drawn directly from the biblical texts. Second, there is the content that has been added in service of the story. 

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Donate $75 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you can elect to receive the “Reimagine Church” 2-Book Bundle including ‘Invisible Jesus’ by Scot McKnight & Tommy Phillips and ‘Need to Know’ edited by Danielle Strickland. To donate, haga clic aquí.

the chosen
Actor Jonathan Roumie, center, portrays Jesus Christ in season four of the series “The Chosen.” (Photo courtesy of 5&2 Studios)

In the first category are the characters, dialogues and activities recorded in the four Gospels. Here the process of review is more straightforward because we can compare the original telling of the stories with their depiction in the show.

In some cases, we see that minor alterations have been made or that dialogues have been expanded in ways that remain true to the substance of the story. In other cases, particularly when it comes to the words of Jesus, the writers often make almost no changes, other than putting Jesus’ words into English, of course. They choose to let the Jesus in the show deliver the teaching he speaks in the Gospels almost verbatim.

In the second category are all of the characters, dialogues and activities not recorded for us in the Gospels. A fair amount of the show’s content falls into this category. Here we think of new characters, like Ramah, Barnaby, Shula, Quintus and Shmuel. Additionally, unnamed characters are given names, like Eden (Simon’s wife) or Gaius (the Centurion), and other named characters are given backstories and new dialogues to flesh out their personalities. 

These elements of the show are fiction, and because of that, they have drawn the most attention and criticism.

Douglas Huffman, another expert consultant for the scripts, reminds us that “The Chosen” is often trying to hold three things together in balance: biblical fidelity, historical plausibility and character relatability.

We can take an example from the second episode of season three to illustrate this process. Jesus tells the disciples he is sending them out in pairs to proclaim the message of the kingdom and perform miracles (Matt. 10:1–15). Afterward, when he leaves Simon’s home, Jesus is approached by “Little James,” who is astonished at the idea that Jesus has given him the power to heal others.

In particular, Little James struggles to reconcile this with his disability. “I just find that difficult to imagine with my condition, which you haven’t healed.”

the chosen biblical fiction
In The Chosen, Little James (Jordan Walker Ross) discusses healing with Jesus, portrayed by Jonathan Roumie. (Courtesy of 5&2 Studios)

What follows is a deeply moving pastoral conversation between Jesus and his disciple about the problem of pain, how it relates to the goodness of God and what it means to share a close relationship with God in suffering. 

Again, none of this is taken from the Gospels. Little James’ disability and the entire conversation are purely the creation of the writers. So how might we assess the theological accuracy of this scene? 

First, we consider the question of biblical fidelity. The question of why God heals some and not others is an important question for many Christians. Jesus does not address this question directly in the Gospels, but it is still important to ensure that the truths being considered are aligned with biblical testimony. So when we listen to Jesus’ response to Little James, we can ask, “Is this teaching on God, suffering and healing in keeping with the testimony of Scripture on this topic?” Let’s see.

Little James is honest about his struggle. He begins by confronting Jesus directly with the fact that Jesus has the power to heal him but hasn’t. Later, he quotes Psalm 139:14, “I know how easy it is to say the song of David, that I am fearfully and wonderfully made. But it doesn’t make this any easier.” This kind of raw, emotive honesty in the face of suffering is also reflected in the biblical genre of lament, which brings together trust in the goodness of the sovereign God alongside the discontentment we all feel at the way things are in a world marked by sin, suffering and injustice.

Jesus makes clear that sometimes our suffering draws us into a deeper fellowship and union with God. The Apostle Paul often rejoices in his suffering for this reason (Rom. 5:3-4; 2 Cor. 1:5; Phil. 3:10). Suffering unites him to Christ, the Suffering Servant, and what God did for Jesus he will do for all who trust in him, raise them from death and give them a glorified body (Phil. 3:21).

Jesus reassures James that his healing is coming, and in the meantime, his endurance through suffering now is nothing compared to the reward that awaits him in the world to come, a sentiment echoed by Paul in Romans 8:18. All of these truths, and more, are engaged during the exchange between Little James and Jesus.

Second, we consider historical plausibility. The Gospels provide very little information about most of the 12 disciples of Jesus. So we can ask, is it possible that one of Jesus’ disciples had a disability, and is it possible they might have had a conversation like this one? Sure it is.

The proof of this is in the fact that Jesus, who never changes, continues to call people with disabilities to follow him today, and he continues to use them to proclaim the Gospel in powerful ways. Whether this sort of thing is historically plausible and not just possible is more difficult to say. However, we do see in the Gospels that Jesus does not shy away from interacting with social outcasts and even with just ordinary people with ordinary challenges.

the chosen prison
Jonathan Roumie, second from right, portrays Jesus Christ in the series “The Chosen.” (Photo courtesy of “The Chosen”)

Third, we consider character relatability. In this case, the conversation between Little James and Jesus contributes to the character’s relatability in a powerful way. Little James expresses the honest and challenging questions we might bring to God in prayer or to a pastor as we seek guidance for our lives. And when Jesus speaks his love over Little James and embraces him, we are reminded he does the same to us. 

In the case of Little James’ conversation with Jesus, even though the entire segment is fictitious, we can see how it handles important theological topics well without compromising or undermining the teaching of the Bible. If we had time, we could multiply examples from the show just like this one. 

Biblical fidelity, historical accuracy and character relatability are not ends in themselves but a means for helping the creative team behind “The Chosen” to create a show that will have a positive and lasting impact on the lives of millions.

And this work, in all its complexity and difficulty, serves one simple purpose: to introduce the world to Jesus.

Las opiniones expresadas en este comentario, que se publicó originalmente en Religion News Service, no reflejan necesariamente las de The Roys Report. 

Jesse Stone is theologian in residence at OneHope and completed his Ph.D. in New Testament studies at the University of St. Andrews. In addition to his work as chair of the Global Theological Review Board for Come and See, Stone serves as a visiting professor of Biblical Theology and Missions at Southeastern University. 

COMPARTIR ESTE:

¡OBTÉN ACTUALIZACIONES POR CORREO ELECTRÓNICO!

¡Manténgase en contacto con Julie y reciba actualizaciones en su bandeja de entrada!

No te preocupes, no te enviaremos spam.

Más para explorar
discusión

5 Respuestas

  1. This show is amazing. I must confess, I’m secular myself, and you wouldn’t think it’d be possible to have a show about Jesus that is appealing to non-Christians. But it is. It shows Jesus’ love, kindness, and charisma and one can truly see how he got so many followers. And the political intrigue is fascinating.

  2. The Chosen has brought us the most Jewish and the most relatable Jesus I’ve ever seen portrayed. The “fill in the blanks” approach to telling the story has some people upset, but the creators have been up front about it from the beginning. It has resulted in the fleshing out of some beautiful biblical concepts.

  3. Dallas Jenkins was (maybe is still) a big part of the James MacDonald experience:

    per wiki:

    “Jenkins is a former member of the Executive Leadership Team at Harvest Bible Chapel where he served as the executive director of Vertical Church Media.[4][5] Vertical Church Films, a branch of Harvest Bible Chapel, partnered with Blumhouse Productions and WWE Films to produce The Resurrection of Gavin Stone, a 2017 faith-based film that Jenkins directed with a reported budget of $2 million.

    This shift moved him to move from Hollywood and to start Vertical Church films out of Harvest Bible Chapel in Chicago.”

Deja una respuesta

El Informe Roys busca fomentar el diálogo reflexivo y respetuoso. Con ese fin, el sitio requiere que las personas se registren antes de comenzar a comentar. Esto significa que no se permitirán comentarios anónimos. Además, se eliminarán todos los comentarios con blasfemias, insultos y/o un tono desagradable.
 
Artículos MÁS RECIENTES
Artículos MÁS populares
es_MXSpanish