The Southern Baptist Convention’s credentials committee had a problem.
It had been asked to determine whether or not to expel one of the denomination’s largest churches for violating the SBC’s ban on women serving as pastors. But the committee could not agree on what the word “pastor” meant in a rule that said only man can be pastors. Did it refer to the church’s senior pastor? Or did it mean any role with the title of pastor — such as a music pastor, youth pastor or children’s pastor?
The committee asked the messengers, or local delegates, at the denomination’s 2022 annual meeting for help. What the committee got was an earful instead.
“If we eventually have to form a study committee over every word in our confession of faith, then we’re doomed, and we’re no longer a confessional people,” Albert “Al” Mohler, presidente of the SBC’s largest seminary, told the meeting, adding that Southern Baptists know exactly what a pastor is.
Nearly three years — and a failed constitutional amendment — later, confusion remains about how the ban on women pastors should be applied. In mid-February, the SBC’s Executive Committee voted to expel a church in Alaska after its pastor signed a letter saying Jesus did not put limits on the roles women could play in ministry.
Your tax-deductible gift supports our mission of reporting the truth and restoring the church. Donate $50 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you can elect to receive “Days of Fire and Glory: The Rise and Fall of a Charismatic Community” by Julia Duin, haga clic aquí.

But the credentials committee, which makes recommendations to the Executive Committee on such issues, deemed that a South Carolina megachurch, which has a woman teaching pastor who preaches regularly, remained in “friendly cooperation” with the SBC.
That did not please Clint Pressley, the SBC’s current president.

“My understanding is that our credentials committee deemed a church in friendly cooperation that has a female teaching pastor,” Pressley, a North Carolina pastor, wrote on X. “The committee needs to take another look at this one. Our statement of faith is clear about qualifications for a pastor.”
Mark Goodman, pastor of Rabbit Creek Church in Anchorage, Alaska, said he was saddened to no longer be part of the SBC, after spending his whole life in the denomination.
“I jokingly say I’ve been a Baptist longer than I’ve been a Christian, because my parents took me to a Baptist church while I was still in the womb,” Goodman said in a recent interview.
Goodman said the church had first heard from the credentials committee last year, after someone complained about Lori Pepiton, the congregation’s longtime children and families pastor. After exchanging emails, the committee closed its inquiry, having found no conflicts with the SBC’s beliefs.
“Again, thank you for your cooperation and for the information you provided,” the committee wrote in an email dated Oct. 24. “We value the partnership of Rabbit Creek Church with the Southern Baptist Convention and pray for your continued ministry.”
Things changed when Goodman and other leaders at the church signed a letter in March which argued for no limits on the roles women can hold. Signing that letter went too far, the credentials committee decided, as it gave public support to beliefs that contradicted SBC teaching.

Goodman said that in signing that letter, he was speaking for himself, not the congregation. Not everyone in the church holds the same beliefs, and the church has not taken an official stand on the issue. The SBC holds what are known as complementarian beliefs — the idea that women and men have different roles to play in marriages and in churches. Churches that allow women pastors are often referred to as egalitarian.
Among the members at Rabbit Creek is Randy Covington, the leader of Alaska Baptist Resource Network, the state convention for SBC churches in Alaska. He told Baptist Press, an official SBC publication, there was no conflict between Rabbit Creek’s beliefs and the SBC.
“They do not have egalitarian views,” Covington said. “Their positive impact on the community of Anchorage cannot be overlooked.”
The Rev. Meredith Stone, executive director of Waco, Texas-based Baptist Women in Ministry, said the removal of Rabbit Creek Church was disappointing. She found it odd that the church was essentially being punished because its pastor signed a letter.
“It feels like kind of a witch hunt,” she said.
Stone also wonders whether SBC pastors — and not just churches — are being put on notice that any disagreement with the SBC statement of faith on the issue of women in ministry will not be tolerated. That’s not how the SBC handles other issues, such as baptism or who can take Communion. The SBC statement of faith says that only those who have been baptized by immersion can take part in Communion.

“But they’re not kicking churches out because someone who was sprinkled for their baptism took Communion,” she said.
NewSpring Church, a megachurch in South Carolina where Meredith Knox serves as a teaching pastor and preaches regularly, remains in friendly cooperation with the SBC. That decision has led to public criticism of the credentials committee.
Suzanne Swift, the risk and legal services director for NewSpring, said in an email that only men can be lead pastor or elders at the church but women are allowed to be leaders and to preach.
“We recognize a biblical distinction between the office of elder/overseer — reserved for qualified men — and the shepherding and leadership responsibilities that both men and women may carry,” Swift said. “The term ‘pastor’ at NewSpring refers to shepherding care rather than the formal office of elder. While women are not ordained as elders, they play an essential role in pastoral care, leadership, and teaching, all under the biblical framework of male eldership.”
A media representative for the SBC’s Executive Committee referred media to the credentials committee for comment, which did not immediately respond to that request.
At the SBC annual meeting in 2024, messengers failed to confirm a proposed change, known as the Law Amendment, that would have only allowed churches that have “only men as any kind of pastor or elder as qualified by Scripture” to be part of the SBC.

The amendment to the SBC constitution passed by a two-thirds majority in 2023 but fell short of that mark in 2024 during a required second vote — meaning it failed.
The credentials committee decision on NewSpring baffled Jared Cornutt, pastor of North Shelby Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama. In an interview, Cornutt said a past credentials committee had recommended the Executive Committee expel Saddleback Church for having a woman teaching pastor. So why not NewSpring?
“This is exactly like Saddleback,” he said. “The inconsistency is pretty glaring to me.”
Cornutt, who backed a successful 2023 change to the SBC’s statement of faith meant to clarify the definition of pastor, said some churches are using the word in a way that’s not “biblically permissible.”
“There is no difference between a senior pastor, associate pastor or children’s pastor,” he said. “If you have the title pastor, then you have the office of pastor.”
The easiest solution, said Cornutt, is for churches to change the titles they use. Rather than calling someone a children’s pastor, call them a children’s ministry director, he said. The title of pastor should be limited to men who preach or have authority in the church.
He said one reason the Law Amendment failed is that a system was already in place to deal with churches that have women pastors. Now that system has failed. He predicts the Law Amendment — named for Virginia pastor Mike Law, who proposed it — or something like it will be reintroduced this year.
“I can’t see how it won’t pass,” he said.
The belief that only men can be pastors was added to the SBC’s statement of faith in 2000. But no churches were remoto on a national level for violating that until 2023, when the Executive Committee voted out Saddleback. That’s for a number of reasons, said Griffin Gulledge, pastor of Fayetteville First Baptist Church, about 45 minutes south of Atlanta.
Until the advent of social media, he said, most Southern Baptists had no idea who was serving on the staff of other churches. So even if a church like Saddleback ordained a woman as pastor, few people would know.

“How many Southern Baptists 10 years ago could name a single staff member at Saddleback apart from Rick Warren?” said Gulledge, referring to Saddleback’s legendary pastor, who retired from the church in 2022. By contrast, Saddleback announced the ordination of three women staffers as pastors on the church Facebook page in 2021 — setting off a denomination-wide debate. The debate intensified after the church named Stacie Wood, wife of Andy Wood, who succeeded Warren, as a teaching pastor.
He also said that for pragmatic reasons, churches have for years used the term “pastor” incorrectly — applying it to a wide variety of roles. He said Southern Baptists agree on what a pastor is. But they have not always been consistent in how they use the word.
Changing that will be complicated, Gulledge said. Some would prefer churches just change titles for staffers, while others want a more top-down approach along the lines of a Law Amendment. He does not see much widescale support for women pastors.
“There is zero chance that what the future holds for the Southern Baptist Convention is a consensus that allows for women pastors,” he said.
Goodman worries that the more the SBC draws hard lines, the more it will shrink.
“They keep narrowing the understanding of what it means to be a Southern Baptist church,” the Alaska pastor said.
Bob Smietana es reportero nacional de Religion News Service.
18 Responses
99% of men in the church aren’t pastors. 0% of the women are. Either of those numbers being a problem says a lot about the tendency for the church to be very ME oriented. The heart of the gospel is service. My title doesn’t come into focus when serving is my primary focus.
This has got to be about the silliest thing I’ve seen in a while. “Of course we know what a pastor is”… (then all sides continue to argue over just that.) Silly. To me the whole concept that you can’t have a woman pastor is silly. But I’ll table that. The idea that having a woman ‘pastor’ is a huge problem, but having a woman do THE EXACT same thing just with a different title is perfectly fine, has got to be about the silliest thing I’ve seen in a while. But that’s SBC for ya.
“But I’ll table that. The idea that having a woman ‘pastor’ is a huge problem, but having a woman do THE EXACT same thing just with a different title is perfectly fine, has got to be about the silliest thing I’ve seen in a while. That’s SBC for ya.”
That’s also USSR for ya. Where titles and organization names changed on a New & Improved daily basis while the original org and function (and behavior) remained intact. From ChEKA to OGPU to NKVD to KGB (and now FSB).
What is there to argue? Paul is very clear on the role of women in the church, and in marriage.
God, and HIS Son Jesus however, have women in very important roles throughout scripture. It is clear that man/woman cleave to each other in marriage, and strengthen one another.
Genesis 2:24
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”
Mt 19:4-6
4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
Mk 10:8-9
8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.
9 What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
What does this have to do with s woman being a pastor? It doesn’t even say anything about marriage….
Did you read what was written before the scripture references for the context?
Paul places women in a corner, do not preach/speak, do not ask, etc … and if a church places Paul’s words above God’s and Jesus’ teachings, then a discussion is not needed. They are to follow what Paul claims are a woman’s place in a church and marriage.
God places women in a co-position that brings the different strengths of both genders together, in order to bring out the best in each other, not one to abusively rule over the other.
Women are prominent in Jesus’ ministry, being involved in some of the most important moments, of witness, and teaching.
If the SBC spent as much time living out the gospel as they do about what women can and can not do, they might actually regain their mission and purpose.
Apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, and teacher are more descriptions of functional roles than they are fixed offices. In all of the biblical texts that talk about appointed leaders in local churches, the language used is elder (prebyteros) or bishop (episcopos). Pastor (shepherd, poimen) is never mentioned as being appointed to position of ruling authority.
So maybe they should quit using the term pastor when they really mean elder.
The SBC is fine spending money quibbling over what label certain people can and can’t use but can’t be bothered to address the abusers within their ranks. It’s all about priorities.
“They keep narrowing the understanding of what it means to be a Southern Baptist church…”
Until they reach the theoretical end point of The One True Church of One, i.e. “ONLY ME, NOT (ALL OF) THEE!”
“Why Are Southern Baptists Still Arguing About Women Preachers?”
Misdirection like a stage magician’s lovely assistant?
Get everybody so focused on those uppity wimmen preachers they won’t notice Alpha Male Pastors doing the Ted Haggard/Josh Duggar two-step?
Do they require women to cover their heads and not speak in church? And why not?
Rules and regulations are loved by Pharisees Not so much by Jesus.
I agree with Henry’s comment above: “The idea that having a woman ‘pastor’ is a huge problem, but having a woman do THE EXACT same thing just with a different title is perfectly fine, has got to be about the silliest thing I’ve seen in a while. But that’s SBC for ya.” Somebody find me the letter the Alaskan pastor signed so I can sign it, too! Jesus turned the culture on its ear when it came to women. Paul affirmed all Jesus did and took it even further with women like Phoebe leading a house church. I know… why don’t we actually just stay busy doing what we are each called to do and leave the arguments. Let’s represent and serve Christ in our individual callings and become the Bride the Father will present to the Son.
https://bwim.info/open-letter-to-baptist-women/
That’s the link to sign the letter.
Dead branch straining at gnats while victims of sexual abuse lay by the road waiting for a Good Samaritan in a sea of SBCs.
I’m so over the theological nitpicking and continuous power plays within the SBC. All of that energy and drama “in the name of Christ” is a waste of good oxygen. Anyone with an ounce of common sense should run from that vipers’ nest and never look back.
The title, “ Why Are Southern Baptists Still Arguing About Women Preachers?” is promoting egalitarian undertones. It is unfortunate, assuming biblical ignorance. Individuals consistently engender false narratives and engage with faulty premises. Conflation of cultural and biblical norms and seek power agendas. Then label the antithesis of an egalitarian must be enveloped with misogyny. Problem is the premises are selfish and have an unbiblical to a quasi conclusion. Finally, if you disagree (but willing to dialogue) the name calling starts. People veering from logic tend to verbally project subjective experiences on those who disagree. Conclusion is a majority of the comments promote a power dynamic in hierarchical structures. Biblical fidelity does not function with that exegetical dynamic. It is why Paul challenges Timothy to “THINK”. I’m ready for attacks and they have a repetitious vernacular, lacking transcendent and yet profound objectivity.
Believers must remember that the devil knows scripture too; and as we see repeatedly in the Bible the devil will try to trip us up with scripture by twisting it (Eve in the garden of Eden) or getting us caught up in the legalism of it (Jesus in the wilderness, and His many faceoffs with the Pharisees).
The nonstop arguing over women is yet another example. The devil’s got us going in circles with each other; imagine if we took this same passion we are using to fight each other over “if a woman should be preaching or not” and used it to fight the devil to win the world for Christ.