The founder of a religious nonprofit that aims to hold the evangelical community accountable engaged in “behavioral misconduct” with a key contractor, according to a report by a firm that independently investigates Christian institutions.
The 94-page document prepared after a six-month-long investigation by Godly Response to Abuse in the Christian Environment (GRACE) identifies systemic shortcomings at The New Evangelicals (TNE). Specifically, it revealed founder Tim Whitaker’s inappropriate treatment of Adele Mulford, then-TNE creative + brand director.
The TNE board engaged GRACE to conduct the investigation in August 2024, after Mulford accused Whitaker of a “rage driving” incident that left her scared for her safety. Mulford, who is referred to as “RV” in the report, also claimed Whitaker and the TNE board mishandled her initial concerns and attempts to resolve them.
Mulford told The Roys Report (TRR) she supports the findings and conclusions of the report.
“The documentation contained many shocking elements that validate our experience, and the depth of the issue with TNE and its leader, Tim Whitaker,” Mulford said. “We had been trying to address the misconduct from Tim and the board for months. Seeing the report confirm our beliefs, and affirm our credibility was a relief.”
Your tax-deductible gift supports our mission of reporting the truth and restoring the church. Donate $50 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you can elect to receive “Saving Face: Finding My Self, God, and One Another Outside a Defaced Church” by Aimee Byrd, click here.

Whitaker told TRR that he fully accepts the report and does not dispute any of its content.
“I never denied the findings,” Whitaker said. “Absolutely, this is misconduct. Thankfully, the report says there was no malicious intent found. That is absolutely true. There was not a bone in my body that was trying to do ill will toward anyone, period. And that’s why I want to own the misconduct and say, ‘Yeah, that was inappropriate.’”
However, Mulford said she believes TNE has focused more on institutional protection than victim repair.
“Having to ask for basic consideration and support over and over has been exhausting. And then watching my story and reputation publicly litigated on their Instagram has been shocking and re-traumatizing,” Mulford said.
‘Rage driving’ and response leads to grievance, resignations
According to Mulford, the “rage driving” occurred in May 2024 after she arrived late at Whitaker’s home, where they were meeting to drive together to a documentary shoot. She said she had been up nearly all night, working to revise the script and had continued working on it at a coffee shop that morning. She messaged Whitaker to let him know she was running late and apologized profusely.
Mulford wanted to drive to the filming location, but Whitaker asked her to get into his car.
“You could just cut the air with a knife,” Mulford told GRACE investigators of the tension in the car.
Mulford said Whitaker began driving quickly, changing lanes, honking, cussing, and muttering throughout the 40-minute commute. Scared for her safety, Mulford began wondering why she was not valued enough by Whitaker that being late would lead to “this fearful, scary situation.”

When Mulford later attempted to address the incident with Whitaker, she said he appeared irritated, frustrated and didn’t offer an apology. She said her assignments for The New Evangelicals soon became “lower level work,” which she felt was retaliatory.
Eventually, Whitaker suggested he and Mulford work with a mediator to resolve their growing conflict. He selected a mediator who had previously appeared on the podcast and who was featured in another episode posted the day of mediation (the podcast had been recorded previously). Mulford said she discontinued mediation after realizing the mediator may not be unbiased because of her previous work with Whitaker.
Mulford contacted Whitaker to let him know she “loved TNE” and wanted to continue working toward a resolution. When she shared her concerns about the mediation, she said Whitaker “exploded.”
“He just started to harangue me, lawyer me, and I just remember I started crying again, because . . . there would be no slowing down on his part,” Mulford stated in the report.
After reaching out to two TNE board members but receiving little support, Mulford and Cherri Rodriguez, another TNE contractor familiar with the situation, submitted a grievance to TNE in July 2024 about the rage driving incident.
In September 2024, Mulford resigned from TNE. She stated that the rage driving incident revealed “deeper issues” within the organization, such as a “demonstrable inability to listen, empathize, apologize, and change.” Rodriguez also resigned for similar reasons.
After interviewing Whitaker, Mulford and others connected to TNE, GRACE found Mulford’s allegations to be credible and that she had “no discernable motive to lie.”
The report described Whitaker as “well-intentioned, often kind, and capable of self-reflection and ownership of behavior in some contexts.” But GRACE also found inconsistencies in some of his statements.

For example, Whitaker told GRACE investigators that he wasn’t aware of concerns about his driving until “at least several months after everything happened.” He added that he learned of accusations “through the grapevine.”
But the report states that in late May 2024 – three weeks after the incident – Whitaker told the TNE board that Mulford had reported to him that she felt unsafe during the ride.
The report noted that Whitaker “held significant power within TNE as the founder, executive director, sole employee, and public-facing personality” and that, in some circles, “he was viewed with almost celebrity status.” Because of the power differential between Whitaker and RV, the report concludes Whitaker “committed behavioral misconduct in the form of verbal, nonverbal, and physical acts that were improper, including a lack of self-control, controlling behaviors, and holding double standards.”
GRACE included several recommendations for TNE to implement to prevent similar situations from occurring again. They include continuing efforts to decenter Whitaker as the source of primary creative control and diversifying the TNE board to include those who are not followers or fans of TNE. GRACE also urged TNE to own harm caused to individuals.
TNE board member Christian VandenHeuvel said the board plans to implement every recommendation in the report.
“The only thing is, which bite are we going to take first out of this huge watermelon of recommendations?” VandenHeuvel said. “We’ve got to get this done, and we’ve got to get it done in a timely manner, without rushing. We want to get it done in a professional manner so we don’t put (Whitaker) or the organization in a tougher spot in the future.”
Former New Evangelicals contractors launch accountability website
Nine days after the final report was sent to the involved parties, Mulford and Rodriguez launched the TNE Reckoning website, publicizing the report and its findings. On the site, they stated that TNE’s failure to publicize the report left them to “bear the emotional and physical labor of revealing this information.”
“We did not go public to destroy TNE, but to call it back to its mission of a better way forward in the Christian tradition,” Rodriguez told TRR. “We spent months trying to hold Tim accountable behind the scenes in an effort to mitigate future harm for other TNE volunteers, employees, contractors, partners, and the community at large. We do not believe he feels true remorse or understands why the things he did are harmful.”
Whitaker and VandenHeuvel said they were surprised by the launch of the site.
VandenHeuvel said TNE never intended to “bury” the report and that board members were discussing how to publicly present it without causing further harm to Mulford when the website went live.

“My preference would have been that we would have had contact with the reporting victim in the future saying, ‘Hey, now that we have this report, is this something you want to keep quiet?” VandenHeuvel said. “We wanted to do it the opposite way of any organization that would want to sweep things under the rug. We want to go the other direction and really be as open and as honest as possible.”
VandenHeuvel said he texted Mulford and Rodriguez soon after the website went live March 15. He said they expressed disappointment that TNE hadn’t reached out about the report and declined a phone conversation about it, saying they were traumatized and needed time to process.
Mulford and Rodriguez confirmed that a TNE board member reached out after the TNE Reckoning website went live and that they “did not feel comfortable or safe” returning the call. They asked for all communication to be done in writing.
Mulford and Rodriguez said they don’t feel comfortable working alongside TNE to implement the report’s recommendations without a mediator present.
“I don’t feel safe with them, and their actions have continued to perpetuate tangible harm in our lives,” Mulford said. “The impact of this is rippling throughout the deconstruction community. Their Instagram accounts contain comments displaying the most horrific outpouring of online bullying minimizing our harm. We spoke up and asked (the) organization to embody their mission and confront their behaviors, but the organization has hid behind screens rather than addressing a scared, tired woman.”
VandenHeuvel and Whitaker declined to comment on the TNE Reckoning website and its content.
Ann Marie Shambaugh has reported as a print journalist in multiple states, including currently in Carmel, Indiana.
13 Responses
Is “behavioral misconduct” the same as “moral failings”? I need to keep up on my euphemisms for “sin”. I have an idea, how about men stop meeting alone with women who aren’t their wives, sisters, or daughters. This would eliminate 90% of the behavioral misconduct, moral failings, etc. and the other 10% is beyond the scope of this post.
The problem of men’s “behavioral misconduct” is not caused by meeting “alone” with non-family females….men harm/abuse their wives, sisters, daughters, sons etc. in statistically high numbers.
I understand the heart behind your suggestion, but when the “BillyGraham Rule” is exercised it is just one more way that men justify excluding women from power and networking. The “good ol’ boys” way is how this works, especially in patriarchal church systems. So male pastors should never provide pastoral support to women? Two professionals – one female, one male – should never meet to discuss business? Two friends of the opposite sex can never grab coffee? What if instead we just expect men to not behave in egregious ways?
Ravi Zacharias claimed to follow the Billy Graham Rule.
Hi Daniel, If men cannot behave themselves around women who are not their wives, mothers, or sisters, they have no business being in any sort of leadership, full stop.
if the solution to their behavioral misconduct/moral failings is to remove women from the equation, that’s putting the responsibility and blame for mens’ sin incorrectly on women. if men can’t control their lust/actions, they should not be in leadership- it’s not a woman’s fault, it’s squarely that man’s fault.
I get where you’re coming from but, Tim isn’t being accused of sexual harassment. So he could’ve just as easily treated a male contractor the same way.
Interesting that: “ “VandenHeuvel said. “We’ve got to get this done, and we’ve got to get it done in a timely manner, without rushing. We want to get it done in a professional manner so we don’t put (Whitaker) or the organization in a tougher spot in the future.’ “
Noted: concern for the institution of TNE and the man In position and power, Tim Whitaker, not the victims.
I am a former listener of Whitaker’s and was hopeful about his purported purpose.
No more.
Observe the actions and believe them. Don’t believe words.
Oh dear. I guess going back to the “same old Evangelicals” will have to do. Bullies will be bullies.
Pure misogyny. He wouldn’t have taken a male contractor for a “ride.”
A single road rage incident? This is a scandal? Are you kidding? Come to live in Los Angeles where every Christian alive can tell you about “inappropriate” behavior in a motor vehicle. Talk about “straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel”, the Roys Report is becoming flypaper for Pharisees.
Thanks for this detailed and nuanced report. Seems like an evolving story that is still in progress.
I have no dog in the fight, being only a very occasional listener to TNE, but here’s to hoping that the right next steps are taken.
““We spent months trying to hold Tim accountable behind the scenes in an effort to mitigate future harm for other TNE volunteers, employees, contractors, partners, and the community at large. We do not believe he feels true remorse or understands why the things he did are harmful.””
In other words, we lost control of him, and needed to expose him to retain control of the church. Was he asking for money on behalf of the church during this time?
Jesus has a simple and direct way of dealing with people like this, and it doesn’t take months to resolve it:
Matthew Chapter 18
15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.
Update from TNE Reckoning: After a concerted push to control the narrative, TNE is back to business as usual, re-platforming Tim with little hesitation. They stood by as those who released the report experienced severe online backlash, and heavily campaigned behind the scenes to minimize the victim’s experience and report findings, including making phone calls, creating finsta accounts, and challenging a reporter. Isn’t that the opposite of supporting a victim and their healing? It’s just another organization where misconduct is minimized.