Study: Only Half of American Households Donate to Charity

By Associated Press
A woman prays at Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church in Johnston, R.I. on March 29, 2020, as Rev. Peter Gower celebrates Mass from the front door while worshippers listen over the radio from their cars. (AP Photo/David Goldman)

For the first time in nearly two decades, only half of U.S. households donated to a charity, according to a study released Tuesday. The findings confirm a trend worrying experts: Donations to charitable causes are reaching record highs, but the giving is done by a smaller and smaller slice of the population.

The study, published every other year by Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, comes from a survey that has been tracking the giving patterns of more than 9,000 households since 2000, when 66% of U.S. households donated to a charitable organization.

That number dropped to 49.6% in 2018, the latest year with comprehensive figures from those households.

Experts say many factors are contributing to the decline. The percentage of Americans who give to religious causes has decreased in tandem with lower attendance at worship services as the number of Americans not affiliated with any religion grows.

Separately, the share of Americans who give to secular causes began to drop following the economic turbulence of the Great Recession, but it hasn’t bounced back. It reached a new low — 42% — in 2018, the study said.

Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Untwisting Scriptures: Wolves, Hypocrisy, Sin Leveling and Righteousness” by Rebecca Davis.  to donate, click here.

Una Osili, the associate dean for research and international programs at the Lilly School, suggests this is, in part, because the Great Recession made it difficult for some younger Americans to establish a habit of giving. The study found only about a third of households headed by someone under the age of 40 gave to charity in 2018, a trend Osili believes will be a challenge for charities.

“What are the factors that will bring them into giving? Especially if they are not attending services, and not participating in networks that will lead to giving,” she said.

The nationally representative study from the university does have its limitations. It measures giving to charitable organizations, but doesn’t analyze donations made through informal crowdfunding campaigns, which tends to draw younger audiences. It also doesn’t measure contributions of goods and services.

The study says declining levels of trust among Americans for institutions and each other may also contribute to the move away from charitable giving. That mistrust is especially pronounced among millennials, which could cause another layer of challenges for charitable organizations.

The data shows a majority of households headed by a person who had a college or a graduate degree, and was married or widowed gave to charity. Wealth was also a factor.

Nearly 8 out of 10 households with more than $200,000 of wealth gave to charity in 2018, the study said. By contrast, less than 4 in 10 households with wealth less than $50,000 made donations.

“The overall pie (in giving) is slowly moving towards the ultra wealthy,” said John List, an economics professor at the University of Chicago who studies giving, adding that this shift can be dangerous. “Rich people give to causes that rich people want to give to,” he said. “You have a very different supply of goods and services from the charitable community when the rich people give versus when the middle-class or lower-class gives.”

Critics have long argued that large charitable donations by wealthy philanthropists are only possible in an era of rising income inequality, a point philanthropist MacKenzie Scott cited during her latest announcement of donations.

Phil Buchanan, the president of the Center for Effective Philanthropy and author of “Giving Done Right: Effective Philanthropy and Making Every Dollar Count,” believes the declining giving participation rate also shows charities are failing to communicate their message effectively.

American society tends to deify businesses and and athletes, he said. “And we can do a better job of elevating the work and heroism of nonprofits in communities all across the country.”



Keep in touch with Julie and get updates in your inbox!

Don’t worry we won’t spam you.

More to explore

5 thoughts on “Study: Only Half of American Households Donate to Charity”

  1. Another possible factor in this trend is the new U.S. tax law passed a few years ago. In addition to blowing up the deficit by giving big tax cuts to corporations and the super-wealthy, it changed a threshold so that fewer people are in a position where it makes sense to itemize deductions. So there’s a big group of people that no longer saves money on their taxes if they make charitable donations.
    Ideally, of course, people would give out of heartfelt motives and not care about the tax benefit. But real people don’t always behave ideally.

  2. I’d like to know where the data comes from. If it is from IRS statistics, the conclusion is almost worthless. I prepare tax returns for a living. Many of my clients gave generously to charity in 2019 and 2020, but since they did not have enough other deductions to itemize, the contributions did not show up on their tax returns. Also, if you look at giving as a percentage of income, my middle income clients give much more generously than my high income clients. In 20 years of practice, I’ve learned that the richer people get, the less they give as a percentage of income.

  3. First off, why are these questionable organizations tracking people anyway???
    My giving and your’s are private and nobodies business!
    If the people of the United States found out what I know of these so-called charities, there would be “0” giving to any charity!

    1. It says in the story that it is from a survey that tracks over 9000 households. Participation in such surveys is voluntary, so your insinuation of nefarious tracking is incorrect (as is the guess of the previous commenter that it was from IRS data).

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people use their full name when commenting. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.

Comments are limited to 300 words.

Leave a Reply

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people register before they begin commenting. This means no anonymous comments will be allowed. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.
MOST popular articles


Hi. We see this is the third article this month you’ve found worth reading. Great! Would you consider making a tax-deductible donation to help our journalists continue to report the truth and restore the church?

Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Untwisting Scriptures: Wolves, Hypocrisy, Sin Leveling and Righteousness” by Rebecca Davis.