On Leading Well, Part Two: Dan George

By Jackson Elliott

It can be hard to know when your organization has an abusive leader.

So says Harvest Bible Chapel elder, Dan George, who once defended Pastor James MacDonald to the church’s elder board. However, the last in-person meeting between George and MacDonald was very different.

Over the course of that four-hour meeting, George saw MacDonald’s manipulation, cruelty, gaslighting, and flattery for what it was—bullying. And George says he realized that MacDonald wasn’t a victim, as he repeatedly insisted, but a predator.

Steven Hassan, an expert on cults and a mental health counselor, said in an interview with NBC that anyone, even very intelligent people, can fall prey to the deceptions of a toxic or cult-like leader or system. But he said those who don’t understand how these systems work are the most susceptible. 

George unfortunately learned this lesson the hard way. He served as an elder at Harvest from 2010 to 2015, and then again from 2018 until his 2019 resignation.

Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Is it Me? Making Sense of Your Confusing Marriage” To donate, click here.

In part two of our series on how to lead well, George shares vulnerably about his Harvest experience—and shares the lessons he’s learned in hopes that others won’t repeat similar mistakes. To read part one, click here.

The following Q&A has been lightly edited for clarity and conciseness.

Jackson Elliott: What was your experience from the inside of the James McDonald scandal at Harvest?

Dan George: In 2010, I joined the elder board. I served two consecutive three-year terms, from 2010 to 2015. Then I rolled off the board, although I was still technically an elder in the church, and rejoined the board actively in late December 2018.

The board changed a ton during that time. I joined when it was expanded from about nine to about 30 people.

It felt like you were you were stepping into a story that already had a lot of chapters written.

If I had it to do over again, I’d have more questions from the start. I’d like to have asked why we did things the way we do and why we were going the way we seemed to be going. I’m not exactly a shy guy when it comes to asking questions. But if I look back, I would have asked more questions and pushed back on how we did some things.

Elliott: Was there something suspicious about the way things operated at Harvest from the start?

George: Early on, it was hard to know that there were major problems. It’s probably hard in the beginning to look carefully at things.

What ends up happening is you step into a history, and the history gets presented to you by the people who are there. You don’t get to go revisit the history. Someone’s painting a story to you.

I’ve looked back at training from 2010. Some things strike me now when I look at them.

At the end of the training, there was a section called Fatal Elder Moves. There were five things on the list. The first was “a suspicious/scrutinizing/cynical spouse.” You were supposed to do all your eldering in the elder board meetings, not outside of that. You were only supposed to deal with the senior staff. They emphasized, “don’t have a breach of confidentiality, you can’t tell your wife everything.”

There was always discussion of protecting the senior pastor. Why are we talking about protecting the senior pastor? What will we be protecting him from? Why does he need to be protected?

Elliott: Psychologically speaking, when people are in an abusive relationship, they sometimes struggle to realize it was abusive. Is abusive leadership like that?

George: Yeah. When you’re in the midst of it, you’re assuming good intent. You assume, “We’re serving, we’re doing the Lord’s work here.”

When you assume you’re the good guys, you don’t look at things that seem a little weird. You’re like, “Look! Look at what God’s doing. Look, there’s churches being planted, and there’s people coming to Christ. Look at the baptisms!” Some of the not-so-great parts, you just say it’s not a big deal.

Eventually, narratives get built up. And they’re just accepted. At one point, there was a discussion about how we were sailing into bigger ministry waters.

People were like, “Well, then we should accept the fact that there will be choppy waters.”

Well, that’s interesting. Why are you saying that?

Elliott: What helped you realize something was wrong?

George: What helped me a ton was rolling off the elder board for a little bit and then coming back. That gave me a new perspective.

When you think about healthy boards, I don’t want “lifetime elders,” in terms of always being on the board. I think there’s a temptation in that. It can become my identity instead of a way I serve.

It also can be intimidating to other people joining the board. I’m not suggesting that you immediately replace your whole board. But when you’re sitting in a room with someone who’s been there from the start new people tend to defer.

Elliott:  Was there a specific incident when you realized something was wrong at Harvest?

George: I remember one of the guys saying that they were going to reform the leadership team.

I just said, “Hey, I’m open to it.” When we got to the next elder meeting, it was presented as: “Everybody on the leadership team has resigned to make room for new people.” I thought, “You didn’t ask me to resign.”

That’s a little bit deceptive. That’s misrepresenting what the conversation was. That just bugged me a bit.

When I came back on the board, it was significant when John Secrest (former pastor of Harvest Bible Chapel Naples) was fired.

I had never talked to John, because I heard about his firing from a friend of mine. I told the chairman, “We need to talk. No senior staff person can be fired without the elders even knowing about it ahead of time.”

That was the tipping point.

Elliott: How can people do better at noticing when things are going wrong?

George: I’d be looking for a culture of humility. I’d be looking for openness. Would leaders feel comfortable if someone was bringing something up in meetings about the system or about the senior pastor?

Are elders isolated? Can elders talk with each other? Are the elders visible to the congregation?

I’d be looking for accountability. What’s in place for accountability for the senior pastor? Does the senior pastor actually welcome accountability and roll out the red carpet for it, because they’re going to have to continue to be accountable.

How much does the church talk about itself versus Jesus and his sheep? If we’re always talking about just our entity versus the people and the Lord, I wonder about that.

Are pastors prioritized over the elders? If you start to create the idea that the pastors are higher than the elders, how does an elder hold the pastor accountable?

Do you have room for discourse? Do you have room for debate, and to realize that discourse does not equal division? Debate or questioning does not mean I’m sowing discord.

The other thing I’d really watch for is who gets on the board. If you’re not a shepherd, you’re not an elder. The idea that elders should get on the board because of their skills instead of how they shepherd people, I don’t see that in Scripture. I saw at Harvest that business experience was prioritized over spiritual gifts.

There’s a cancer in the church in America where the teaching gifts are prioritized, but shepherding is a “nice to have.”

We found ourselves talking about “our church” and whatever God’s doing at “our church” more than we’re talking about Jesus. I don’t even like giving that answer. I think that really was the case. When you’re running around with T-shirts and sweatshirts and hats with your church’s name on it, at some point it becomes a brand. Some of this is wise, and but some of it feeds idolatry.

Elliott: Do you think there was any policy Harvest could have implemented that would have kept things from imploding the way they did?

George: There was a period where we had somebody sitting in our meetings that was functioning as the chief organizational health officer, which was great. That person would ask three or four questions at the end of meetings about how we were approaching problems.

Some examples were, “Did we ask tough questions?” “Are we holding ourselves to a high standard?”

Also, as soon as bad behaviors in a leader come up, you should call them out. It doesn’t have to be big. If you wait till these things are big, how do you walk those back? The whole idea of “short accounts” would be a big deal to me.

Elliott: What would your advice on elder selection be today?

George: If I were looking for elders, one of the biggest things I’d be looking for is that they are not overcome by fear or by cowardice. Somebody needs to be around them for a while before they join the board to see what kind of person they are. Elders need to have moral courage. They need to be able to stand up and do what’s right.

Jackson ElliottJackson Elliott is a Christian journalist trained at Northwestern University. He has worked at The Daily Signal, The Inlander, and The Christian Post, covering topics ranging from D.C. politics to prison ministry. His interests include the Bible, philosophy, theology, Russian literature, and Irish music.



Keep in touch with Julie and get updates in your inbox!

Don’t worry we won’t spam you.

More to explore

13 thoughts on “On Leading Well, Part Two: Dan George”

  1. Good idea for a series, talking about leadership. I’d like to hear some stories of effective boards, as well as of ineffective ones. In particular, it would be good to hear some board members talk about how they successfully nipped problems in the bud, or how they got a pastor or employee to repent and do better, or how the board stopped a pet project of a celebrity. It could be an anonymous interview, if that would allow more frankness.

    1. Indeed. I recall listening to him years ago while traveling in our car with my wife. And he laid out somekind of rules, like a Pharisee adding to the Bible. I suddenly realized he was a false teacher. I rarely if ever listened again.

      Another red flag is the idea that JMac or the “elders” have authority. Jesus is the only Aiuthority in His Church.

      1. Brian Goodmiller

        This is one more fake story they all knew what was going on for a long period they were told the truth about James by a former Elder board chairman 20 plus year’s and other’s all who stepped down earlier. James hand picked every one of them! Ego and power and hand picked was deal. Someone needed to look to the scriptures to see what a Shepard qualities should be and then ask the church who meets the biblical qualification, the word lay it out very clearly. The chose to do it James’s way!

        1. Brian – Yes…
          “Who meets The Biblical Qualification?”

          I’ve noticed, “most” congregations do NOT know the 17+, very, very, tuff Qualifications, for elders, who desire to be oveseers. And if they do know the qualifications, they just “Ignore” them.

          And, “most” “pastors/, leaders, overseers,” who do know the “Qualifications,” will “Ignore,” or “Twist,” the 17+, very tuff Qualifications in 1 Tim 3:1-7, and Titus 1:5-8, so they can maintain their “Titles,” and their Power, Profit, Prestige, Honor, Glory, Reputation, that comes with those “Titles.”

          If the Qualifications in 1 Tim 3:1-7, and Titus 1:5-8, were promoted and paid attention to, a lot of these horror stories could be avoided.

          If a pastor? leader? elder? overseer?
          Does NOT meet the Qualifications?

          Shouldn’t they remove themselves?

          And be a good example to the Flock?

        2. Brian
          Here is a look at just three Qualifications from Titus…
          Many pastors, elders, overseers, “Ignore,” or “Twist.”

          1 – For a bishop (overseer) “Must Be” *BLAMELESS.*
          2 – JUST. 3 – HOLY.

          Titus 1:5-8 KJV
          5 …ordain elders in every city…
          If any be *BLAMELESS,*
          the husband of one wife,
          having faithful children
          not accused of riot or unruly.
          For a bishop “Must Be” *BLAMELESS,*
          as the steward of God;
          NOT self willed,
          NOT soon angry,
          NOT given to wine,
          NO striker,
          NOT given to filthy lucre;
          a lover of hospitality,
          a lover of good men,
          *JUST,* *HOLY,*

          1 – *Must Be*
          Strongs #1163, die. – It is necessary (as binding).
          Thayer’s – necessity established by the counsel and decree of God.
          This *must be* is the same Greek word. – You *must be* born again. Jn 3:7
          Seems to be a small word but very important. Yes?

          1 – BLAMELESS
          Strongs #410 anegkletos – unaccused, irreproachable, blameless.
          Thayers – cannot be called into account, unreproveable, unaccused.
          Dictionary – Without fault, innocent, guiltless, not meriting censure.

          2 – JUST
          Strongs #1342 – dikaios {dik’-ah-yos} from 1349;
          Thayers – righteous, observing divine laws, innocent, faultless, guiltless.

          3 – HOLY
          Strongs #3741 – hosios {hos’-ee-os}
          Thayers – undefiled by sin, free from wickedness,
          religiously observing every moral obligation.

          Now that’s three tough qualifications for elders, to Qualify. Yes?

          How many pastors, elders, overseers, today, who honestly examine themselves, seriously considering these three qualifications, can see themselves as BLAMELESS, JUST, and HOLY, innocent, without fault, above reproach, undefiled by sin, and thus qualify to be an pastor? An overseer? And, if they can see themself as *blameless?* Is that pride? And no longer without fault? ;-)

          If WE, His Ekklesia, His Church, His Sheep, His Body…
          Take seriously the tough Qualifications in 1 Tim 3:1-6, and Titus 1:5-9…

          The number of Biblically Qualified, pastors, elders, overseers…
          Is quite small. :-)

          But, will these UN-qualified, pastor? leader? reverends?
          “Remove Themselves?”
          And be a good example to the flock?

          What is popular is NOT always “Truth.”
          What is “Truth” is NOT always popular.

  2. Robert Ray Braun

    It’s obvious Harvest Church didn’t have any kind of written down church order. That is an agreed upon written process to address issues. Instead, everything seemed to be done by a wink and a handshake. Doing that is just asking for trouble, just like they found it and most like will continue to find it. In my Reformed church order we have an article that states, “No church should lord it over another church, nor should any officer of the church lord it over another officer of the church. (Officers of the church are Pastors, Elders and Deacons) I suggest Harvest Church use that one.

    1. Robert

      You write…
      “…we have an article that states,
      “No church should **lord it over** another church,
      nor should any officer of the church **lord it over**
      another officer of the church.
      (Officers of the church are Pastors, Elders and Deacons)”

      And, in the Bible, it also says…
      Elders are NOT to be Lords over Gods heritage.

      1 Pet 5:3 KJV
      Neither as being lords over God’s heritage,
      but being ensamples to the flock.

      That kinda takes in every believer. Yes?
      NOT just so-called “officers of the church?”

      And, NO Disciple of Jesus, is to…
      “Exercise Lordship” over another Disciple.
      “Exercise Authority” over another Disciple.

      Mark 10:42-45
      But Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them,
      Ye know that they which are accounted
      to rule over the Gentiles
      “Exercise Lordship” over them;
      and their great ones
      ”Exercise Authority” upon them.

      43 **But so shall it NOT be among you**

      But whosoever will be great among you,
      shall be your *minister: (*Servant)

      44 And whosoever of you will be the chiefest,
      shall be **SERVANT** of all.

      And, ALL are to submit one to another.

      1 Pet 5:5 KJV
      Likewise, ye younger,
      submit yourselves unto the elder.
      Yea, all of you be *subject one to another,
      (*subject= same Greek word as submit.)
      and be clothed with HUMILITY:
      for God resisteth the proud,
      and giveth grace to the humble.

      Eph 4:21 KJV
      Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.

      Humility – Humble = Dictionary
      A modest or low view of one’s own importance.

      Know many? Who take the “Titles” of…
      Pastor – Elder – Deacon?
      Who are Humble?
      Having “A modest or low view of their own importance?

      Let me not, I pray you, accept any man’s person,
      neither let me give **Flattering Titles** unto man.
      For I know NOT to give **Flattering Titles;**
      in so doing my maker would soon take me away.
      Job 32:21 KJV

    2. “nor should any officer of the church lord it over another officer of the church”

      What about church officers’ lording it over the congregation?

  3. i knew james macdonald was suspicious from the start. like even a middle schooler like me should have known how he was and all.

    i just hope we can use this horrible situation to prevent from something like this to happen in harvest, or in any other church.

  4. There seems to be some negativity here for a man who was finally brave enough to come forward about some of these things. Some love and grace would seem to be in order, would it not?

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people use their full name when commenting. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.

Comments are limited to 300 words.

Leave a Reply

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people register before they begin commenting. This means no anonymous comments will be allowed. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.
MOST popular articles


Hi. We see this is the third article this month you’ve found worth reading. Great! Would you consider making a tax-deductible donation to help our journalists continue to report the truth and restore the church?

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Is it Me? Making Sense of Your Confusing Marriage”