(Opinion) Southern Baptist social media was abuzz last week when a prominent Baptist theologian announced his departure from the Southern Baptist Convention for the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA).
Matthew Barrett, a professor at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Kansas City for the past eight years, will depart that institution (among the largest seminaries in the country measured by enrollment) for a new role as a Research Professor of Theology at Trinity Anglican Seminary in Ambridge, Pennsylvania.
This is significant news for a modestly-sized institution like Trinity: the school issued a press release trumpeting the appointment, Barrett’s expertise in Reformation theology, and how he helps students “retrieve the Great Tradition for the sake of recovering creedal orthodoxy in the church.”
Trinity Vice President for Advancement Alex Banfield Hicks told media that the seminary’s post announcing Barrett had joined the faculty was seen over 200,000 times within 24 hours.
In a widely circulated substack piece published on July 24, Barrett outlined his journey into Anglicanism at St. Aidan’s Anglican Church in Kansas City. He praises the beauty of liturgical worship experienced in The Book of Common Prayer and how sacramental theology “stands in stark contrast to the disenchanted mindset of our modern world.”
Your tax-deductible gift supports our mission of reporting the truth and restoring the church. Donate $50 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you can elect to receive “Redeeming Eden: How Women in the Bible Advance the Story of Salvation” by Ingrid Faro, click here.
He also took a few shots at the SBC.
“Our family is burnt out on the Southern Baptist mindset—the big show. My family has been crying out for participation, not mere performance,” Barrett writes.
I don’t expect that casual readers will be familiar with Barrett, but I highlight him here because he is emblematic of an evangelical-to-Anglican pipeline among students serious about classical Protestantism.
This isn’t remotely new: it’s been 25 years since Colleen Carroll Campbell researched The New Faithful: Why Young Adults Are Embracing Christian Orthodoxy, an investigation of the reasons behind the choice of orthodoxy in a society that often denigrates traditional morality and rejects organized religion. The draw to liturgy is part of Campbell’s volume, and she name-checked the young adult ministry at The Falls Church (then Episcopal) that I was a part of, Kairos, in suburban Virginia outside of Washington.
Kairos was chock full of Baptists and nondenominational Christians considering historic, liturgical expression of the Christian faith for the first time. For some of them, it was their first opportunity to recite the creeds during a worship service. That ministry concluded 15 years ago this week, but I see its fingerprints across the ACNA.
From 1996-2010, Kairos produced an extraordinary number of clergy and laity who met and, in some cases, formed families from that time period. These now populate the half-dozen daughter congregations of The Falls Church Anglican, among many, many other churches both within and beyond Anglicanism.
Recent analysis has shown that “high demand” faiths tend to be the ones that grow, while those churches that tout “welcome-welcome-welcome” but don’t specify what people are being welcomed to or for tend to plateau and decline.
Recitation of the Nicene Creed is, of course, a significant part of creedal orthodoxy, and Barrett laments the SBC Executive Committee’s rejection of the creed’s inclusion in the Baptist Faith and Message.
“I cannot stay in a denomination where the Nicene Creed has been officially rejected from inclusion and remains blatantly absent,” Barrett writes.
(Denny Burk of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary subsequently pushed back on this assertion, arguing that Southern Baptists Have Not “Officially Rejected” the Nicene Creed.)
I gladly join in welcoming Barrett and his family into the Anglican fold, although I gently caution that the grass is often greener on the other side. Barrett is correct that overseers/bishops (episcopoi) are among the historic, biblical orders, and I value my bishops.

But as a cradle Episcopalian, I also witnessed repeated failures of the episcopacy, and I am uneasy about elevating my Anglican polity as more faithful than that of other Christians. Similarly, those upset by scandal in the SBC will find the same problems in other churches, including Anglican ones (Barrett’s diocese is not immune to crises, nor is my own). The Anglican Church is a hospital for sinners, and our sins are many.
“If the SBC is anything like we are, no one has any reason to boast,” Anglican commentator Anne Kennedy wryly noted.
Fortunately, we’re not here to boast, we’re here to grow in knowledge and love of the Lord. As Barrett himself writes, quoting Luther, “we are beggars.” I’m glad that Barrett has decided to come alongside us in this, as I am grateful for the many current and former Baptists who have enriched us with their teaching and witness (a retired bishop of mine, Martyn Minns, was one such person!)
In looking ahead, Trinity has invited Barrett to deliver the John Rodgers lectures this October.
“I will share my pilgrimage into Anglicanism and explain why I believe Anglicanism is so unique, capable of leading the way, guiding Christians back to biblical orthodoxy,” Barrett wrote this week on Facebook. “What a way to celebrate Reformation week!”
This article originally appeared at Juicy Ecumenism and has been reprinted with permission.
Jeffrey Walton is Communications Director and Anglican Program Director for the Institute on Religion & Democracy.
















9 Responses
I think a good response to the Reformed/Calvinist mindset is Dave Hunt’s great book “What Love is This?”. Several websites offer it in a PDF format. The Reformed “T.U.L.I.P.” theology (better known as the “Five Points of Calvinism”) sounds like a sophisticated approach to Bible Theology, but it is a disguised way to get around the need to be born again.
Seems also like an pseudo spiritual intellectual distraction that once again side steps the 4 gospels which not only reveal the nature of God through Christ. But also the Kingdom values and forms of behaviour that transcend this short life.
There are a few SBC folk responding to Barrett’s charges. I have no skin in the game. I’m just aware.
https://www.dennyburk.com/no-southern-baptists-have-not-officially-rejected-the-nicene-creed/
“. . . guiding Christians back to biblical orthodoxy.” Note the “little o” orthodox in that sentence. Why stop there? Why not become “big O” Orthodox, as in Eastern Orthodox?
We have the Eucharist and we have the Nicene Creed, both of which Baptists and other groups are uncomfortable with. Claiming “biblical orthodoxy” in a world that enthusiastically disagrees about infant baptism, eternal security, eschatology, communion, total depravity, cessationism, and so on is kind of hopeless. Who decides what is “biblically orthodox” and what isn’t?
The Church did not begin in Europe in the sixteenth century with the start of the Reformation. It began at Pentecost in Jerusalem. Why not join us Eastern Orthodox? Why compromise because you still want to be Protestant?
Give him time. He has started on his journey away from low-church Protestantism. From what I have observed from the testimonies of those who end up as Eastern Orthodox or Catholic, quite a few of them start with Anglicanism and over time they later depart Protestantism for EO or Catholic.
Thomas Howard, author of “Evangelical is Not Enough: Worship of God in Liturgy and Sacrament,” is one that comes to mind.
Given ardent Baptist opposition to charismatics, I wonder if he will have misgivings when he discovers their prevalence in the ACNA. . . . or maybe more than beautiful liturgy draws him thither.
Matthew Barrett has produced phenomenal work in the last number of years. Some of the most encouraging developments in academic theology.
Big loss for Midwestern.
Steven Wedgeworth had by far the best take on this transition. Full of both encouragement and caution for Dr Barrett. I commend it to all:
https://adfontesjournal.com/steven-wedgeworth/thoughts-about-when-people-become-anglican/
Theologian Barret is a knowlegable Professor. His choice to leave the Southern Baptists is for his personal reasons..There is different opinions on the addition of religious rituals within the church today..Thought up and applied by men..The Father gave us Jesus Christ. That can be a personal Savior.If you accept Him..As your Savior..It is simple to understand …Jesus walked the earth as a man to share the gospel.. Accept Him as your Savior..This would be the best decsion of your life..
I pastor an SBC church. I graduated from an SBC seminary. We recite the Nicene Creed and Apostles’ Creed somewhat regularly in corporate worship gatherings. I’m teaching a summer-long systematic theology course for my people, walking them through Trinitarian orthodoxy and how it relates to their life and faith. The course refers regularly to the church fathers and their valuable contributions to the formation of Christian doctrine. I ardently preach against passive church membership and “just showing up” to watch the “sermon show.” For better or for worse, I think the SBC is a big tent with many different kinds of churches. It is certainly not a monolithic denomination.