Russell Moore
In this June 14, 2017, file photo, Russell Moore, then-president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, speaks at the Southern Baptist Convention annual meeting in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Russell Moore Leaves Southern Baptist Leadership, But Denomination’s Troubles Remain

By Bob Smietana

Southern Baptists love three things: Jesus, the Bible and a good fight.

The first two have led Southern Baptists to send missionaries all over the world, build colleges and hospitals, plant thousands of churches and develop one of the largest disaster relief networks in the country.

Their fights, however, often overshadow everything else. 

The latest headline coming from the United States’ largest Protestant denomination — Russell Moore’s resignation from the presidency of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, the SBC’s public policy arm — has put the Southern Baptists’ propensity for controversy on clear display.

Conservative, pro-life, anti-same-sex marriage, Moore was hardly a theological outlier among his fellow Southern Baptist leaders, yet his opposition to the candidacy of Donald Trump, whom Moore had once called “an arrogant huckster,” as well as his sympathy for immigrants and concern for the SBC’s sexual abuse victims, put him out of step with the SBC’s political culture.

Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Fractured Faith: Finding Your Way Back to God in an Age of Deconstruction” To donate, click here.

Elected in 2013, Moore was deemed “a source of significant distraction” in a task force report earlier this year to the SBC’s Executive Committee. Critics accused him of being a liberal, and megachurch pastors began to withhold money from the denomination’s missions program in protest.

Moore is gone, taking a job with Christianity Today, but expelling a nettlesome dissenter hasn’t solved a raft of serious problems. At the denomination’s annual meeting in Nashville next month, the leadership will face conflicts over race, the role of women in the church and the unsettled question of how to deal with sexual abuse.

Perhaps most worrying for leadership is the relentless decline in membership, falling by more than two million over the past 15 years, even as several high-profile leaders, such as popular Bible teacher Beth Moore and well-known Black pastor Charlie Dates, have exited the denomination.

Southern Baptist Convention
The headquarters of the Southern Baptist Convention in Nashville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File)

Chuck Kelley, the former president of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary and a leader in the Conservative Baptist Network, a new organization within the SBC that has been critical of current leadership, summed up the denomination’s situation this way:

“Southern Baptists are in serious trouble.”

Rather than pull back on controversy, the Southern Baptists are characteristically doubling-down.

When Saddleback Church, an enormous California megachurch run by the Rev. Rick Warren, perhaps the best-known Southern Baptist in the country, ordained three women pastors earlier this month, critics leapt to call for an investigation. (Women pastors are forbidden by the SBC’s statement of faith.) Objections to a pronouncement from six Southern Baptist seminary presidents calling critical race theory “incompatible” with the statement of faith have been largely ignored by top officials.

Author and speaker Trillia Newbell, a former staff member at the ERLC who has had a front-row seat for the controversies in recent years, said the infighting raises a perplexing question: How do Southern Baptists tell the outside world about the love of Jesus if they can’t stand one another?

“What is so strange to me is people believe that by fighting, they are being faithful,” said Newbell. “It’s hard to convince someone that they may need to be slow to speak and to tame their tongue if they think they’re right. And if they think they’re fighting for Jesus.”

Thom Rainer
Thom Rainer. (Photo courtesy of Lifeway)

Thom Rainer, a longtime Southern Baptist leader, said the challenges facing the SBC are common to many denominations built and held together by shared doctrine, mission, culture and geography. “What is happening in the SBC is that we’re seeing a fraying of all of those ties,” he said.

With fewer resources and a changing culture outside the church, Christians of all stripes are fighting over how to apply their doctrines and how to spend their money, Rainer said. They no longer have a shared church culture — they don’t sing the same songs or study the same books or worship in the same way. 

The general turmoil in American culture has also affected Southern Baptists, said historian Nathan Finn, dean of the faculty at North Greenville University in South Carolina. Baptists might agree on theology and church practice and even be very conservative and still be divided about discussions of politics, race and gender, Finn said.

Those fault lines have made it harder for Southern Baptists to cooperate in their system of funding national and international ministry, known as the Cooperative Program. With no strong central authority, their sharing of resources is completely based on trust.

Nathan Finn
Nathan Finn. (Photo courtesy of North Greenville University)

“Where there is a lack of trust, there is a lack of commitment to cooperative missions and thus, the Cooperative Program,” said Finn.

Southern Baptists also struggle with consensus on their statement of faith, known as the Baptist Faith and Message, first adopted in 1925. Finn summed up their approach this way: “Within the SBC, how do we work the broadest consensus possible, even if that means there might be some people in the consensus who make some of us nervous?”

Other Southern Baptists, he said, “want to clarify the differences.” These Baptists might not want to kick out everyone they disagree with but want to limit who is able to “drive the bus,” as Finn put it.

“The question really is, what are you willing to tolerate for the sake of cooperation?” he said.

The divides in the SBC are exacerbated by the denomination’s significant decline. The SBC’s membership peaked in 2006 at about 16.3 million members. According to data released Thursday (May 20), there are now about 14 million Southern Baptists, a decline of 2.3 million.

Baptisms, meanwhile, dropped by half, to 123,160, though much of this falloff is likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic’s shuttering of in-person services for much of 2020. The denomination also grew by 588 churches. 

Southern Baptist Convention
“2020 Southern Baptist Convention Statistical Summary” (Graphic courtesy of Lifeway)

Ryan Burge, an assistant professor of political science at Eastern Illinois University, predicts that by 2025, Baptists will be at about half their former size, “and more politically homogenous than ever.”

Both current SBC leaders and their critics agree that addressing the decline, and a refocus on evangelism, is paramount. Earlier this year, Ronnie Floyd, a former megachurch pastor who now leads the SBC’s Executive Committee, announced plans for “Vision 2025,” an initiative to send out new missionaries, plant more new churches and increase evangelization of young people.

Kelley, of the Conservative Baptist Network, sees the decline as an organizational failure. The denomination’s North American Mission Board, he said, moved away from personal evangelism in the 1980s to a focus on church planting. That has led to more churches but not more baptisms and Southern Baptists.

Churches have also dropped the ball on keeping and inspiring church members, he said, a practice known as “discipling.” From the 1920s to the 1970s, he said, Southern Baptists had a range of programs to help people grow in their faith and learn to live according to Christian teaching. Those programs, he said, have largely run out of steam and disappeared.

“You combine that failure of discipleship with less and less attention to evangelism and a culture that is less and less hospitable to the Christian faith and guess what?” he said. “You have declining churches.”

Chuck Kelley SBC
Chuck Kelley. (Video screengrab)

But Kelley also faults a major upheaval during the 1980s known as the Conservative Resurgence, in which a rearguard of traditionalists who favored male headship of the family and inerrancy prevailed in the “battle for the Bible.” The conservative movement won a theological battle over liberals in the denomination, but it didn’t make the SBC “more effective in reaching our nation and our world for Christ,” said Kelley, who supported the resurgence.

Now Kelley and others in the Conservative Baptist Network see themselves battling “incipient liberal theology” that has invaded the SBC anew. Discussions of social justice, Black Lives Matter and critical race theory are all signs of liberalism sneaking in the back door.

Kelley believes that the Southern Baptist Convention, which was founded by slaveholders and thrived in the Jim Crow South, has moved on since repenting of its racism in a 1995 resolution disavowing its past. It has no need, he said, for unbiblical movements such as Black Lives Matter or CRT.

The Conservative Baptist Network, formed in 2020, exists in part to hold the line against what it calls “worldly ideologies” infiltrating the Southern Baptist Convention. Its leaders recently published the text of a resolution condemning critical race theory at a website entitled “Southern Baptists Against Racism.”

In a statement published on the network’s website, the group wished Moore well in his new role at Christianity Today and asked Baptists to pray for the future of the ERLC.

The statement also praised Georgia Baptist pastor Mike Stone, a longtime critic of Moore and the ERLC who is running for SBC president at June’s annual meeting.  Stone, a former chair of the SBC Executive Committee, pressed for and led a recent task force that looked into Moore’s leadership at the ERLC and its effect on giving in the SBC.

“Pastor Mike Stone did not just talk about the issues,” the statement read. “He boldly acted in the face of great opposition. That is the very kind of leadership that is critically needed at this hour.”

Russell Moore
Russell Moore, president of the SBC’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, speaks during the annual meeting of the SBC in June 12, 2019. in Birmingham, AL. (RNS photo by Butch Dill)

Randy Davis, executive director of the Tennessee Baptist Mission Board, said that he was thankful for the leadership Moore showed during his time at the ERLC, especially on pro-life concerns. But he called Moore’s departure an “opportunity for a new direction.”

Just as many, however, will be disturbed by where Moore’s departure leaves the SBC. The Rev. Marshal Ausberry Sr., president of the National African American Fellowship of the SBC, said Moore has been key to the denomination’s handling of racial matters, specifically encouraging his fellow Southern Baptists to live up to the 1995 resolution.

“Dr. Moore has been a tremendous friend to the National African American Fellowship and on the forefront of race relations,” Ausberry said. “He’s been a very positive force in the convention and sometimes even the conscience of the convention in the area of race relations.”

He added that Moore has left “tremendous” footprints in the denomination and that he can’t be replicated.

“I think the person coming in can’t be another Russell Moore, but if they’re a person of good conscience and good moral character and a high view of Scripture, and not only the Great Commission but also the Great Commandment, that we love one another, they will, as God has wired them, they will fill the void.”

Newbell pointed out that Moore’s tenure at the ERLC did not create divisions over race and politics in the SBC. The polarization of recent years simply revealed what was hidden.

Trillia Newbell SBC
Trillia Newbell. (Courtesy photo)

Healing those divides will take repentance and honest conversation and some changes, said Newbell. “I feel very much like, this is what the Bible says,” she said. “Why don’t we just do it?”

The answer may lie in the Southern Baptists’ proclivity for fighting. 

Phillip Bethancourt, the pastor of Central Church in College Station, Texas, and former vice president of the ERLC, said Moore told him that he was leaving in part because of the toll the years of anger toward him was taking on his family.

At one point, one of Moore’s sons went to him with a question: Did you do something wrong?

That led Moore to take his son to a meeting of the SBC’s Executive Committee so that the young man could see what was happening with his dad.

That reason for Moore’s departure, as much as anything else, left Bethancourt worried about the SBC’s future. 

“The Southern Baptist Convention has to decide whether they want to be a house of prayer for the nations or a retirement home for a furious few,” he said.

Bob SmietanaBob Smietana is a national reporter for Religion News Service.

Adelle Banks contributed to this report. 



Keep in touch with Julie and get updates in your inbox!

Don’t worry we won’t spam you.

More to explore

7 thoughts on “Russell Moore Leaves Southern Baptist Leadership, But Denomination’s Troubles Remain”

  1. Margaret ISHIKAWA

    Tim Challies put a great article in his A La Carte in early February of this year. It was from Feb. 2nd and here it is: The answer is “no, we do not pursue unity at all costs.” What is happening in the SBC is a good thing and it shows that with the pursuit of unity, there must be the pursuit of truth. Russell Moore’s time had come. Many of us do not want our leaders in the SBC to mention any political candidate by name – not one. The issues, yes and Moore did a good job with that but he crossed the line by letting us know for whom he would or would not vote. That is his business. The SBC will grow through this. If you follow the “whole picture” of the SBC and not just “the elite,” you will see how the people in the pew are now on the move. It is exciting. More and more want to do short term missions and more and more want to hold our SBC leaders accountable. We no longer can trust them to make solid decisions. We will be more like the Bereans through this. This is good.

  2. Brian Patrick

    I have tried many times to give both of the Moores a chance, but they’ve blown every one. I liked it that Russell refused to bow the knee to Trump, but instead he bows the knee to CRT and the cult of white self-hatred and that’s just as bad. Paige Patterson was a first-class jerk but so does Greear who enables abuse and perversion from Bryan Loritts on the basis of the latter’s skin color. The false gospel of wokeness is going to destroy most of God’s church on earth.

    1. Margaret ISHIKAWA

      Brian, I so agree. I think we are giving up too easily on JD Greear’s role in the Brian Loritt’s issues and for JD, as the SBC president back pedaling almost immediately after the 6 SBC seminary president’s signed on to the statement stating that CRT is not compatible with the Word of God. People pleasers can not please God.

  3. James Lutzweiler

    Dear Readers,

    One of the main problems in the Southern Baptist convention is the presence in it of one of the people quoted in this piece. I refer to Nathan Finn. Finn symbolizes the lack of fraternity and facts in the SBC, the lack of which I find high on the list of reasons the SBC is headed for life supports.

    Two things:

    1. I know for a fact that “historian” Finn, who earned his PhD by using the papers of John R. Rice that I brought to Southeastern Baptist Seminary, once in my presence spun a totally false story about SBC saints Henry Blackaby, Al Mohler, Danny Akin, and a scholar at Southern Seminary. I know it was false because the story was so incriminating and sensational that I called said scholar and asked him about it. He said it never happened. I know of other such misconduct. As with the late Ravi Zacharias, I would never accept a statement by “historian” Finn, including what he has to say on this thread or in any other forum, without secondary confirmation. Read him at your own risk.

    2. I know for a fact that Baptist “brother” Finn once went behind the back of another faithful and accomplished brother in order to get him fired. He did so without first going to that brother to explain his complaint (a totally invalid and anti-scholarly complaint), as Jesus suggested (or commanded? I cannot recall which) we do in Matthew 18, when we see a brother in whom we see a fault.

    I omit here one of the most fascinating adultery and fistfight stories involving him that you will ever read about unless you read it in my autobiography —unless Br’er Finn wishes to volunteer both it and justifications for his misconduct cited above for readers on this thread in order to determine if he himself is not one of the reasons the SBC is shrinking.


    James Lutzweiler, A Southern Baptist still
    Archivist (1999-2013), Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary

    1. This comment is uncalled for and maybe be slander. I know both Mr Lutzweiler and Dr Finn. If this accusation is true, this is not the place. If it is false, This is slanderous.

  4. James Lutzweiler

    Sadly, Mr. Straub is in no position to say what is called for and what isn’t.
    I prefer to think of my comments above as simple descriptions, not accusations. But readers are certainly free to discount and disregard them. No problem at all. Perhaps frater Finn would like to answer for himself, just as he is quoted in this edition of the Roy’s Report. I for one would find fascinating his contribution.
    I might add that while I see a lack of fraternity as a major factor in the shrinking of the SBC, I know of other examples of fraternity in the SBC, were they widely known, that would encourage any pagan or Presbyterian to jump on board. However, this is not the time or place for that revelation. When I find the right tangent somewhere, I will bless hearts everywhere with it. Unlike John MacArthur’s frequent baloney, my story will steer quite clear of his evangelasticism.

    James Lutzweiler

  5. From what I’ve watched over 40 years, Baptists love fighting. They don’t feel that they’re being faithful if they aren’t fighting with someone. When you mix in ignorance and slander — calling anything and everything “liberal” or “emergent” or “woke” or “CRT”, regardless of facts — it makes for a bad brew.

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people use their full name when commenting. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.

Comments are limited to 300 words.

Leave a Reply

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people register before they begin commenting. This means no anonymous comments will be allowed. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.
MOST popular articles


Hi. We see this is the third article this month you’ve found worth reading. Great! Would you consider making a tax-deductible donation to help our journalists continue to report the truth and restore the church?

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Give a gift of $25 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Is it Me? Making Sense of Your Confusing Marriage”