investigation
Southern Baptist Convention President J.D. Greear addresses the denomination’s Executive Committee in Nashville, Tennessee, on February 18, 2019. (RNS photo by Bob Smietana)

Pressure Mounts for Independent Investigation of SBC Executive Committee Handling of Abuse

By Bob Smietana

The chairman of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Executive Committee plans to call for an independent investigation into the committee’s handling of sexual abuse claims when it meets next week in Nashville, Tennessee.

Rolland Slade, pastor of Meridian Baptist Church in El Cajon, California, said he would also support a proposal from two Southern Baptist pastors for an investigation, which will likely be raised during the denomination’s annual meeting June 15-16.

“It’s never the wrong time to do the right thing,” he said.  

Russell Moore, who recently resigned as the president of the SBC’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, has accused Executive Committee leaders of mishandling claims of abuse.

In letters leaked recently, Moore accused Georgia Baptist pastor Mike Stone, a former chairman of the Executive Committee and current nominee for SBC president, of trying to “delay the formation of a credentials committee to assess churches reported to be mishandling sexual abuse.” Moore also said he had been in meetings with SBC leaders where abuse survivors were referred to as “crazy” and were compared to Potiphar’s wife — a reference to a Bible story where a woman made a false accusation of sexual assault.

Give a gift of any amount to The Roys Report and receive a copy of “Have we lost our Head?: Reconnecting churches with Jesus” To donate, click here.

Stone, a leading candidate for SBC president, called Moore’s accusations “slanderous” and denounced Moore’s letter in a video posted to Twitter.

“It’s unscriptural, it’s ungodly, it’s outrageous,” Stone said.

The Georgie pastor has long been a critic of Moore and chaired a task force that labeled Moore and the ERLC as a “significant distraction” to the denomination’s work.

Jared Wellman, pastor of Tate Springs Baptist Church in Arlington, Texas, and a member of the SBC Executive Committee, is concerned with how Baptist leaders have handled accusations of abuse. He said Baptist leaders have failed to listen to abuse survivors and he wants to see an independent investigation.

Wellman worries some Baptist leaders may want to set up an internal task force to look at the matter. That would be a mistake, according to Wellman.

“I think it is time for an outside investigation,” he said. “I think messengers from SBC churches deserve that — to help regain trust back in our Executive Committee.”

Rachael Denhollander, an attorney and abuse advocate who has advised SBC leaders in the past, said an independent investigation fits with Southern Baptist theology. Southern Baptists value truth and believe in repenting if they have done something wrong.

An independent investigation looks for truth and if there is wrongdoing, calls for repentance, she said. And if nothing was done wrong, an investigation will show that.

“No one should have any fear of an investigation,” she said. “No one should fear the truth being brought into the light.”

She suggests Southern Baptist leaders consult with experts in dealing with abuse before setting up a third-party investigation. That will help ensure the third party does a thorough job, she said.

Denhollander served on an advisory task force set up by SBC President J.D. Greear to help the denomination deal with reports of sexual abuse revealed in a major investigation by the Houston Chronicle in 2019. She has also been critical of how the denomination has responded to abuse survivors.

That criticism earned the ire of D. August “Augie” Boto, a longtime staffer at the SBC’s Executive Committee. Boto, a now-retired vice president and general counsel of the Executive Committee, accused Denhollander and another activist of exaggerating the scope of abuse in the SBC and of being misled by a “misdirection play” of the devil.

“This whole thing should be seen for what it is,” he wrote in a 2019 email recently published by a Southern Baptist blogger. “It is a satanic scheme to completely distract us from evangelism.”

As an Executive Committee staff member, Boto long opposed calls for the creation of a database to track Southern Baptist pastors accused of abuse or any denomination-wide policies to deal with abuse — citing the autonomy of local churches.

In a move that concerned advocates for abuse victims, Boto testified on behalf of a Tennessee gymnastics coach who had been convicted of abuse during the coach’s appeal of his conviction. Boto also acknowledged in court, according to a 2018 ruling, that he had contributed to support the convicted coach’s defense. 

Boto did not respond to requests for comment.

A spokesperson for the Executive Committee said Boto’s actions happened under a previous administration.

Frank Page, the former president of the Executive Committee who resigned in 2018 due to a “personal failing,” said he was not aware of Boto’s “personal or professional intervention on behalf of a convicted abuser.”

“To hear of this has caused me a great deal of personal sadness,” he told Religion News Service in an email.

Asked about Boto’s involvement in a case regarding an abuser, the Rev. Ashley Easter, spokesperson for the “For Such a Time As This” rallies calling for SBC reforms on abuse, said that often the people in an abuse trial courtroom supporting the alleged abuser are church members and church leaders.

“It’s horrific to hear that money changed hands in support, and that there was support of the predator,” said Easter, who has helped run protests calling for a database of sex offenders within the denomination.  “But that’s kind of par for the course in these situations. Sadly, I’m not surprised but I am sickened.”

About 16,000 messengers are expected to attend the SBC’s meeting in Nashville. Among the topics for discussion will be an ongoing controversy over racism and Critical Race Theory and the continued decline of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination. The 14 million-member SBC has lost more than 2 million members since 2006.

Adelle M. Banks contributed to this report. 

Bob SmietanaBob Smietana is a national reporter for Religion News Service.

SHARE THIS:
  •   
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

GET EMAIL UPDATES!

Keep in touch with Julie and get updates in your inbox!

Don’t worry we won’t spam you.

More to explore
discussion

9 thoughts on “Pressure Mounts for Independent Investigation of SBC Executive Committee Handling of Abuse”

    1. Christopher Burcham

      It’s a disappointing and unfortunate smear, regardless–as both Rush & David have been very clear about their personal faith in Christ. Whichever one is indicated, they belong to Him, so Limbaugh and the Lord should hardly be seen as mutually exclusive.

      1. Rush Limbaugh’s personal life choices–including multiple failed marriages and drug addiction–were far from a model of moral conduct even while his public schtick was to loudly mock and criticize others for far less.

        In this, I think he has much in common with the SBC leaders described in this article, who display a similar hypocrisy.

  1. Here in Australia, all major Christian denominations have created a system whereby anyone in a position of leadership (either paid or voluntary) has to have what is called a “working with children check”. This ensures that sexual predators who have been charged in the past cannot involve themselves in ministry of any kind. It’s not perfect but it has prevented a lot of problems in the last 20 years.

    While the SBC and Baptists generally would baulk at having some sort of national register to achieve the same sort of thing, it does not require a top down denominational approach. Individual churches should organise themselves into creating a non-profit that has information about pastors and volunteers. The idea would be that churches and individuals would be members of this organisation, and that organisation carries important information about each individual linked to it, such as educational qualifications, marital status, criminal history (including sexual abuse) and theological emphases.

    So any church who is a member of this organisation would only hire staff who are members of it, and members would only want to work at churches that are also members. A pastor who sins sexually would then have a flag put on his file, giving future churches this information. A pastor who has improved his qualifications by, say, getting a D.Min, would have that put on his file, giving future churches that information.

    What would eventually be created would be a quality assurance system, ensuring that churches are more willing to hire staff or appoint volunteers that are members of this organisation. The organisation is essentially responsible for doing the “due dilligence” that many churches can’t do on their own.

    Churches would also be free to not belong to such an organisation, and individuals are also free to not be part of it. But the overall result would be an incentive to hire godly pastors, and for godly people to enter into ministry training.

    1. American evangelicals already tried the accountability thing when they set up Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability to address serious financial wrongdoings and to stop the government from stepping in (it was that bad). As regular readers of this site will already know, the ECFA is little more than a rubber stamp these days, more intent on providing a thin veneer of respect for its clients than enforcing any real accountability.

  2. SHARON RADIGAN

    I don’t understand why these SBC leaders don’t understand why covering up the sins of the people is a big deal. God does not honor cover ups and wrong doings. Protecting the people who abused their authority for the “greater good” of evangelism won’t work, I don’t think.

    1. What so hard to understand? These people are not God’s ambassadors, they are Satan’s, Satan disguises himself as an Angel of Light, and so do his children. In Jesus’ day Satan had successfully and completely taken over the priesthood and the whole system that God originally commanded be instituted. The SBC was not directly set up by God in that way so how much easier is it for Satan to take over the top power structure of this man made affair? Why can’t people see what is so evident and clear? Jesus loved the poor and hated the religious rich and powerful. They killed the beloved son of God in fits of jealousy and rage. Why do we refuse to be like Jesus?

    2. Bob has just posted a new article called ‘Preserve the Base’ which should help you their reasoning…

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people use their full name when commenting. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.

Leave a Reply

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people register before they begin commenting. This means no anonymous comments will be allowed. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.
 
MOST RECENT Articles
MOST popular articles

Donate

Hi. We see this is the third article this month you’ve found worth reading. Great! Would you consider making a tax-deductible donation to help our journalists continue to report the truth and restore the church?

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. This month we’re offering a beautiful “The Roys Report” branded mug to anyone who gives a gift of $25/mo or more.