Survivor Advocates Praise Bill Passed by Congress Limiting NDAs in Sex Harassment Cases

By Sarah Einselen
NDA House Sexual Harassment
The U.S. House of Representatives votes to approve bill limiting NDAs in sexual harassment and assault cases. (Source: Screengrab/C-Span)

Christian abuse survivor advocates are praising a bill passed today by the U.S. House of Representatives making certain non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) unenforceable in claims of sexual harassment or sexual assault.

The Speak Out Act (S.4524) bars courts from enforcing NDAs that were signed before someone claimed they were sexually harassed or assaulted. It passed 315-109 on Wednesday. The bill had passed the Senate in September and now awaits the signature of U.S. President Joe Biden.

NDAs have been increasingly used to muzzle people in evangelical churches and Christian organizations, The Roys Report explained last year. Lee Furney, Lori Anne Thompson, and other advocates have been outspoken in asking churches and other Christian entities to reject the use of NDAs.

Lori Anne Thompson NDA
Lori Anne Thompson

“After the initial sexual assault/harassment that victims suffer, they lose their ability to communicate their own narrative, to in effect participate in public and private truth telling due to NDAs,” said Thompson, who remains bound by an NDA to the executrix of the estate of the late apologist Ravi Zacharias. “Truth telling, so essential for recovery, is wrapped in legal secrecy and subsequent legal threat if they dare raise their voice against their offender. . . . This next step, while limited in scope, is a step towards empowering survivors to speak their own word, rather than be spoken for, or spoken about while they suffer in silence.”

NDAs have a place in protecting proprietary knowledge, Furney said. But when they are “slipped into employment contracts,” they become “a preemptive strengthening of the power imbalance that exists between an organization and its workers.”

Give a gift of $50 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive our 2-Book Bundle of “Celebrities for Jesus” and “Redeeming Power.” To donate, click here.

“They are the polar opposite of the biblical mandate to defend the needs of the oppressed by suppressing even their calls for justice,” Furney added.

More than a third of the country’s workers have to sign NDAs as part of their employment, according to Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-New York), who cosponsored the House version of the bill.

Nadler stated the bill defines a claim as when someone makes a complaint of sexual harassment or assault in some official way, such as to a government agency or in a lawsuit.

Given how many workers are bound by NDAs, “this is an act that defuses a significant timebomb with a large blast radius,”

Lee Furney NDA
Lee Furney

Furney said. “In many ways it is just one small step.”

Furney noted that it applies only to claims of illegal sexual harassment or assault. Lawmakers also said the bill wouldn’t affect NDAs that are signed when settling a claim and would not apply to claims made before the bill is signed into law.

Still, it’s “a very welcome move by the state and one in the right direction: towards eliminating the misuse of NDAs entirely,” Furney said.

States like California, New York, and Pennsylvania have similar laws already on the books. Some opposed the bill as an example of federal overreach that duplicated existing federal worker protections.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) asked for the vote to be recorded as yeas and nays rather being passed by a voice vote. Former athletes at Ohio State University have claimed Jordan knew about alleged sexual misconduct by an OSU team doctor while Jordan worked at OSU, but Jordan has denied that.

Jordan and 108 other House Republicans voted against the bill.A hundred other Republicans and all House Democrats voted for the measure, which was introduced in July by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-New York). Four Democrats and four Republicans did not vote.

Sarah Einselen is an award-winning writer and editor based in Texas.

SHARE THIS:
  •   
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

GET EMAIL UPDATES!

Keep in touch with Julie and get updates in your inbox!

Don’t worry we won’t spam you.

More to explore
discussion

3 thoughts on “Survivor Advocates Praise Bill Passed by Congress Limiting NDAs in Sex Harassment Cases”

  1. Jordan and 108 other House Republicans voted against the bill.

    Why are conservatives always on the side of the abusers, not the abused?

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people use their full name when commenting. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.

Comments are limited to 300 words.

Leave a Reply

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people register before they begin commenting. This means no anonymous comments will be allowed. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.
 
MOST RECENT Articles
MOST popular articles
en_USEnglish