ÚNASE A NOSOTROS EL 20 Y 21 DE MAYO PARA LA CONFERENCIA DE RESTORE

María
De Muth

escocés
McKnight

Screenshot 2023-01-13 at 1.50.18 PM

Naghmeh
panahi

Reportando la Verdad.
Restauración de la Iglesia.

Denomination Instructs Calvin U to Deal with Faculty Dissent on LGBTQ Stance

By Ethan Meyers
calvin college crc faculty christian reformed stand
Universidad de Calvin en Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Foto de Andy Calvert, cortesía de la Universidad de Calvin)

The denomination overseeing Calvin University has asked the Grand Rapids, Michigan, school to develop a process for dealing with faculty members who disagree with parts of church doctrine.

The charge, part of the June 18 annual synod of the Christian Reformed Church in North America, was described as an effort to “rebuild trust” between the denomination and its flagship school. In particular the synod was concerned with faculty members who oppose the denomination’s 2022 decision to codify in its confession of faith “homosexual sex” as sinful.

Delegates to this month’s synod also voted to instruct churches that are LGBTQ+-affirming to repent of their stance or disaffiliate with the denomination and placed church officers who are LGBTQ+-affirming on “limited suspension.”

While the synodical report recognized “Calvin’s efforts to be faithful to the Reformed confessions in the context of academic inquiry,” some members of the university faculty raised concerns about the decisions’ implications for academic freedom.

The decisions at the 2024 synod involved major changes to church policy on confessional difficulty, sometimes also called a “gravamen.” A gravamen is an official statement that church members and other officebearers may file to register disagreement with a specific part of church doctrine. 

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Give a gift of $50 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Ghosted: An American Story” by Nancy French. To donate, haga clic aquí.

CRCNA synod
Delegates sing during the Christian Reformed Church annual synod at Calvin University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Photo by Ethan Meyers)

Calvin faculty are not considered church officebearers, but Calvin is one of the denominational institutions instructed to “review and revise, as needed, their gravamina policies.”

A number of Calvin faculty have submitted gravamina related to the denomination’s stance on human sexuality. The exact number is hard to ascertain since these statements of confessional difficulty are confidential. But following the synod’s 2022 decision elevating the view of LGBTQ+ sex as sinful, about a dozen faculty came together as a cohort to file formal disagreements, or gravamina.

As a denominationally affiliated school, Calvin faculty are required to sign a covenant affirming the Heidelberg Catechism. They are also required to pledge to “teach, speak, and write in harmony with the confessions,” according to the faculty handbook. 

David Koetje, a professor of biology and vice-chair of the faculty senate, said the administration was “still trying to figure out what this means for Calvin faculty who’ve acted in good faith within Calvin’s longstanding gravamina process.”

James Bratt, a retired history professor, noted that the synod’s request isn’t new. Throughout the 1940s, faculty were required to submit their course outlines to the synod for review. In the 1980s and 1990s, Calvin physics professor Howard Van Til was subject to scrutiny by the denomination related to his scholarship on the Earth’s age and the publication of his controversial book, “The Fourth Day,” which opposed creationism. During the early 2010s, the synod questioned several Calvin religion professors over how they taught creation and evolution.

CRCNA Neland
Pro-LGBT demonstrators outside the annual synod of the Christian Reformed Church at Calvin University in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Wednesday evening, June 14, 2023. (Photo by Grace Buller)

Some Calvin faculty are nervous about the implications of the synod’s decisions for the future.

“The CRC has provided many, many blessings and gifts in my life,” said Debra Rienstra, professor of English at Calvin. “But what happened last week is a new version of the CRC. I have never seen the complete shutting down of principled dissent like we saw this week.” 

For Rienstra, the decision means more uncertainty for Calvin faculty and students. University administrators held a town hall meeting for faculty earlier this week.

“I came away trusting that the university leadership and the board of trustees want to continue to carve out a place and a way for Calvin University to be the kind of institution it’s always been,” said Jamie Smith, professor of philosophy at Calvin, after the meeting.

The synod instructed Calvin’s board to bring a progress report on the confessional-difficulty gravamen process to next year’s denominational meeting.

“We don’t expect any immediate impact on faculty or students in 2024-2025,” Provost Noah Toly said. “I’m encouraged that there’s a path forward in which we build on the policies and procedures we already have in place.”

The authority to decide next steps for the university rests with the 31-member board of trustees, which was charged to present a progress report to next year’s synod. Some board members are chosen directly by the synod, and all board members must be approved by the synod.

calvin university
Campus of Calvin University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Video screengrab)

Calvin has a reputation of rigorous intellectual inquiry. Elizabeth Koning, a deacon delegate to the synod and a recent alumna of Calvin, said, “The things that I experienced at Calvin are different than what people get at a lot of other Christian schools,” noting that “people here talk about evolution as something that our understanding of is glorifying to God.”

Smith attends Sherman Street CRC, which has been moving to disaffiliate from the denomination over its LGBTQ+-affirming stance. His lament for his church mirrors his worry for the university.

“I worry that Calvin University, like some of our congregations, are going to have to face the possibility that you can either be CRC or you can be Reformed,” Smith said. “To be Reformed is to be always reforming … It means a spirit of intellectual and deep theological inquiry and wrestling with the ongoing work of the Spirit to discern what it means to be faithful now.”

Ethan Meyers is a journalist and contributor to Religion News Service.

COMPARTIR ESTE:

¡OBTÉN ACTUALIZACIONES POR CORREO ELECTRÓNICO!

¡Manténgase en contacto con Julie y reciba actualizaciones en su bandeja de entrada!

No te preocupes, no te enviaremos spam.

Más para explorar
discusión

5 Respuestas

  1. There should not be a “process” for figuring these things out. If anyone in the church is attempting to disseminate a view counter to what the Bible says they should be told to either re-align themselves with the Bible, or leave. This is how error creeps into the Church. You take a vote to see what the majority thinks instead of sticking to what your stated doctrine and theology is and has always been. You do not adjust that because you have some teachers or faculty that now want to be LGBTQ+ affirming because it is advantageous to do so culturally. There are plenty of squishy progressive denominations they could go to and fit right in with. But they are not content with that because they have a desire to infect the people around them with the same disease that they have.

    1. I know many professors and former students of Calvin University who are LGBTQ+ affirming, and their views have nothing to do with caving in to culture. I have also read multiple scholars who have concluded that the Bible is unambiguous in its denunciation of homosexuality, but also question whether those commands, written in a time when homosexuality was practiced almost exclusively in the context of sexual exploitation and cult prostitution, are applicable to long-term, monogamous relationships. In both cases, they honestly believe that affirming is the more loving and Christ-like response.

      I don’t agree with their conclusions, but I can respect their motivations, and I know they share my commitment to strive to be more like Christ, hence why we can engage in civil discussions on this topic. Your comment betrays how little you’ve seriously engaged with people of opposing views.

      1. Any time I see someone write “multiple scholars” and then tell me that these same scholars are consciously trying to explain away or re-work what the Bible says, I am fairly confident I am dealing with someone who puts the Bible on a lower level than academia. What a scholar says about these things is meaningless if it disagrees with what the Bible very simply and plainly says about these issues. The Bible is blatantly clear on the issue of homosexuality. Just as many scholars, some of them who are liberal and are not even Christians say that there is absolutely no foundation found in the Bible for homosexuality being normative or acceptable. If you have opened your mind to believe that things the Bible clearly says are wrong are now somehow acceptable, and have searched for others who say the same thing to bolster that belief, you may want to examine your motivations for doing so. The Bible is not ambiguous on these issues. Only the secular culture is.

  2. I am a graduate of Calvin University. I credit my time there with opening my mind to the idea that there isn’t a single “Christian view” on most issues (abortion, sexuality, government welfare, the Israel/Palestine conflict, etc.), and with building a deeper understanding that what many conservatives call “biblical” is heavily influenced by their own cultural assumptions. When I first arrived, I was basically a right-wing Evangelical with Fundamentalist tendencies; by the time I left, I had reexamined many of views, keeping some and rejecting others, but through it all, I maintained a strong commitment to a Christ-centered life. To see the CRC go down this path toward fundamentalism is honestly painful.

  3. Paul does not associate a non-literal interpretation of Genesis with God’s wrath. The same can also be said of women preachers, men with long hair, women not wearing coverings, or not greeting each other with a holy kiss. These issues are not associated with God’s wrath and shouldn’t be conflated with those that are.

Deja una respuesta

El Informe Roys busca fomentar el diálogo reflexivo y respetuoso. Con ese fin, el sitio requiere que las personas se registren antes de comenzar a comentar. Esto significa que no se permitirán comentarios anónimos. Además, se eliminarán todos los comentarios con blasfemias, insultos y/o un tono desagradable.
 
Artículos MÁS RECIENTES
Artículos MÁS populares
es_MXSpanish

Donar

Hola. Vemos que este es el tercer artículo de este mes que ha encontrado que vale la pena leer. ¡Estupendo! ¿Consideraría hacer una donación deducible de impuestos para ayudar a nuestros periodistas a continuar informando la verdad y restaurar la iglesia?

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Give a gift of $50 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Ghosted: An American Story” by Nancy French.