De Muth


Screenshot 2023-01-13 at 1.50.18 PM


Reportando la Verdad.
Restauración de la Iglesia.

Is A Pastor’s Sin A Private Matter? Johnny Hunt Lawsuit Makes That Claim.

Por Bob Smietana
johnny hunt
Pastor Johnny Hunt speaks in October 2021 at Fairview Knox Church in Corryton, Tennessee. (Video screen grab)

In the middle of 2010, not long after his term as Southern Baptist Convention president ended, Johnny Hunt took time off for his annual vacation.

He planned to return to the pulpit at First Baptist Church in Woodstock, Georgia, in early August. But just before his first Sunday back, Hunt Anunciado he was taking a leave of absence, citing his health and a sense of exhaustion.

What no one knew at the time was that Hunt had another reason for his leave.

On July 25, 2010, while vacationing in Florida, Hunt had kissed and fondled another pastor’s wife in what his attorneys would later call a “brief, consensual extramarital encounter.”

Then Hunt spent more than a decade covering the incident up.

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Give a gift of $30 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Hurt and Healed by the Church” by Ryan George. To donate, haga clic aquí.

Without telling his congregation — or the millions of Southern Baptists he had represented as their president — Hunt went through a secret restoration process that included counseling sessions with the woman he had fondled and her husband. He then returned to the pulpit.

For a dozen years, no one was the wiser. Hunt retirado from First Baptist in 2019 and took on a new role as a senior vice president for the SBC’s North American Mission Board and continued his busy and often lucrative career as a preacher and public speaker.

Then, in 2022, an investigation into how SBC leaders dealt with the issue of abuse was released, and his name was included in the report. 

Guidepost Solutions
Guidepost Solutions logo. (Courtesy image)

Over the course of their inquiry, investigators from Guidepost Solutions, the firm hired by the SBC, had heard about Hunt’s misconduct and learned that the woman involved in the incident — who has not been named publicly — described it as a sexual assault and as non-consensual.

“We include this sexual assault allegation in the report because our investigators found the pastor and his wife to be credible; their report was corroborated in part by a counseling minister and three other credible witnesses; and our investigators did not find Dr. Hunt’s statements related to the sexual assault allegation to be credible,” investigators from Guidepost concluded.

When the report became public, Hunt first denied it and claimed the incident was consensual. He resigned from NAMB, went through another restoration process, then made a defiant return to the pulpit earlier this year.

Johnny Hunt
Los pastores Mark Hoover, de izquierda a derecha, Mike Whitson, Steven Kyle y Benny Tate en un video sobre su trabajo de restauración con Johnny Hunt. (captura de pantalla de vídeo)

This past spring Hunt filed suit against the Southern Baptist Convention’s Executive Committee and Guidepost, claiming they had ruined his life by revealing his misconduct and including him in an abuse report.

The heart of Hunt’s claim of invasion of privacy and defamation was summed up in a recent court ruling filed by his attorneys. Hunt’s sins, they wrote, were a private moral failing that should have been kept confidential.

“Pastor Johnny was not the president of the SBC or a member of the Executive Committee at the time of the incident,” they wrote in a memorandum, opposing the denomination’s attempts to have the case dismissed. “He was merely a private citizen whose marital fidelity was nobody else’s business.”

That claim raises a series of questions.

Can a pastor’s sins ever really be private? Can a pastor who has made a living urging others to follow a morality code then claim his own failings are no one else’s business? And was the harm done to Hunt’s reputation primarily due to his own acts — both the misconduct and the subsequent coverup?

George Freeman, executive director of the Media Law Resource Center and a former assistant general counsel for The New York Times, said Hunt’s claim to privacy will likely go nowhere in court.

Hunt is undoubtedly angry and embarrassed that his personal failings have been publicized, which is understandable, said Freeman. But as a religious leader who was outspoken about family values and ethical living, his wrongdoings are a matter of public concern, especially in the wake of the #MeToo movement.  

“That’s life,” Freeman said. “That’s not a lawsuit.”

In their court filings, Hunt’s attorneys also claim that including Hunt in a report about abuse could have led readers to think he had committed a crime rather than a moral failing.

“By using this incorrect term and then featuring the information about Pastor Johnny in their public Report that otherwise focused on criminal conduct, the Defendants created the false impression that Pastor Johnny is an accused sex criminal, even though Defendants now concede — as they must — that the allegations against him do not fit the definition of a crime,” they wrote in opposing a motion to dismiss the suit.

 Lawyers for the SBC argued that the Guidepost report did not accuse Hunt of a crime—saying nothing in the report stated that the incident involved a minor.

“The Guidepost Report simply reported its investigation into a report of sexual assault against Plaintiff, who was the immediate past president of the SBC at the time, brought to the Guidepost investigators by an SBC pastor and his wife,” attorneys for the SBC wrote.

SBC Executive Committee
La sede de la Convención Bautista del Sur en Nashville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

The former SBC president’s defamation claim could have some merit if the allegations against him are proven false. But even then, Freeman said, Hunt, a prominent evangelical leader and speaker, would likely qualify as a public figure — making the defamation claim harder. Especially since he had long made public statements about morality, including his signature on the Nashville Statement, a 2017 statement by evangelical leaders that rejects both same-sex marriage and any extramarital sexual activity as sinful.

Hunt would also have to prove the Executive Committee and Guidepost knew the allegations were likely false and still published them. That’s a harder argument to make, given that the woman involved in the incident, who has not been named, insists it was not consensual.

“You have to prove that there was actual malice,” Freeman said. “And that will be hard to do.”

Hunt’s attorneys did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesman for Guidepost Solutions also declined to comment.

“Because litigation is ongoing, we have no further comment beyond our filings,” Scarlett Nokes, special counsel for the Executive Committee, told media in an email.

Christine Bartholomew, a law professor at the University at Buffalo School, said Hunt’s public statements about morality undermine his claim of invasion of privacy.

“You can’t have it both ways,” she said. “You can’t publicly take a position on something and then say ‘If it applies to me — hold up, it’s completely private.’”

Bartholomew said Hunt seems to be claiming a kind of personal version of clergy-penitent privilege in this case. Confessions made to priests or other clergy are considered confidential — and that confidentiality at times has led church leaders not to report abuse or misconduct.

“Just because you’re going to have to answer to your maker doesn’t mean you’re absolved from any public discussion of your misconduct,” she said. 

If Hunt’s argument were to prevail, Bartholomew said, no church or religious group would be able to publicize misconduct by leaders. And even if Hunt did not break criminal law, his conduct may have broken civil laws. Hunt’s defamation claim will depend on the facts and whether he can prove the claims made in the Guidepost report are false. Even then, he will have to prove that those false statements — and not his own misconduct — caused him harm, she said. 

Robert Callahan, a Texas attorney who has represented survivors of clergy misconduct and abuse, also said Hunt’s claim of invasion of privacy will likely fail. He said the defamation claim may survive attempts to dismiss the case.

johnny hunt legal action
El 15 de enero de 2023, Johnny Hunt predica en la Iglesia Bautista Hiland Park en la ciudad de Panamá, Florida. (Captura de pantalla de vídeo)

But Hunt’s legal filings likely undermine the defamation claim as well.

“He had to admit that he had participated in disqualifying behavior,” said Callahan.

The outcome of Hunt’s lawsuit could also impact future attempts to address clergy misconduct and abuse. For years, fear of lawsuits kept Southern Baptist leaders from taking any steps to address abuse, and churches had long avoided making public statements about clergy misconduct for fear of being sued.

Legal worries have also slowed the SBC’s “Ministry Check” sitio web, a database of abusive clergy. Southern Baptists approved the development of the site in June of 2022, but more than a year later, no names of abusive pastors currently appear on the site, not even those who were convicted of crimes.

The committee in charge of implementing the Ministry Check website is scheduled to give an update on its work during the Executive Committee’s meeting in Nashville this week.

The Executive Committee has also faced fiscal woes due to the ongoing legal costs related to the sexual abuse crisis and investigation. In February, the SBC leaders announced the committee’s financial situation was unsustainable after using $6 million in reserves to pay legal bills. Last week, the committee laid off five full-time staffers and two contractors due to fiscal challenges.

Bob SmietanaBob Smietana es reportero nacional de Religion News Service.



¡Manténgase en contacto con Julie y reciba actualizaciones en su bandeja de entrada!

No te preocupes, no te enviaremos spam.

Más para explorar

9 Respuestas

  1. If it weren’t for those pesky Pastoral Epistles…and the laundry list of other atrocities Johnny committed/omitted.

    But, Evangelicals love to replatform these “man of god” type grifters!


    I’m not yelling it, I just copied and pasted it.

  3. Sunshine and bleach are the best disinfectants. Just like the military religious organizations should adhere to the “whole man” concept. Restoration processes are a sham. Who decides that? Churches trying to cover up rapes and sexual assaults is disgusting.

  4. I was a member of FBCW from 2009-2014. I remember when left for his sabbatical in 2010. And when he was gone for longer than normal. I knew something was going on. I didn’t buy the claim of exhaustion. I may have been 18 at the time. But I recognized a cover up when I see one. When he came back. It was as nothing ever happened. And it was never talked about again. My grandmother went to FBCW for years. She loves Pastor Johnny and his family. She even went on a trip to Israel with him and others from the senior adult ministry. She still thinks he did nothing wrong. I am still friends with him on Facebook.

    But I don’t interact with him at all. And haven’t for years. When I still was attending his church. My young adult Sunday School class was invited to his house around Christmas time. His house was beautifully decorated for Christmas. I found out afterwards from my grandmother that his wife Janet paid someone every single year to decorate the house. They had a grand piano in their living room. And least a million dollars in various memorabilia. His house was worth over a million dollars. I did like his sermons. But he liked to yell in his sermons. He and his wife may have grown up poor. But he and his wife have slowly become more out of touch with reality.

    1. I too was a member at that time Ashley and my wife and I heard the same things as you. What I find particularly despicable is that it appears to me that Johnny allowed his closest friends, Jim Law, Dan Dorner, etc. to come before the Church and tell partial truths and lies to cover his misconduct. In my opinion the depravity of that alone knows no bounds.

  5. This is in the courts where it (very publicly) belongs, since Johnny argues that the SBC, its EC, and Guidepost Solutions wronged him in publicizing his behavior and removing blessing from his ministry. In 2010, when Johnny claimed a consensual encounter (which it COULD NEVER have been IMO, given the power dynamic) with the seeming backing of the counselor (conflicted, as he was getting his paycheck from FBCW, with Johnny as Senior Pastor and CEO), the police should have been called. Just as in the case of Bill Gothard (in whose seminar Jesus saved me in 1974, with that providing NO justification for Gothard’s continued and at the time continuing ministry), the police rather than the church or ministry Board NEED to quickly investigate alleged criminal behavior!

  6. Does it seem odd to anybody else that it takes secular courts and secular police to referee the behavior of Holy Spirit-infused Christian Churches’ leaders and clergy?

  7. It might seem odd to me also…but in order to know whether it does or not, I would need to know the definition that we are using for “Holy Spirit-infused Christian Churches’ leaders and clergy.”

    Or, it might be that I caused confusion earlier in referring to Hunt’s alleged crime as merely “behavior.” So, allow me to amend my comments for clarity. When a crime is alleged, whether for Hunt or for David Till, the police need to investigate and engage an appropriate court as needed. This circumstance does not entail a Christian taking his brother to court.

    When a civil complaint arises among Christians, the church should settle it rather than a secular court.

    When a crime is alleged, and the statute of limitations has passed, it is a mess…resulting in secular court(s) having to rule on the matter as though it were a civil case, if the ruling of the church is rejected by the one accused. That is why the police should always be called for immediate investigation of such criminal allegations.

    When preachers (former pastors?) leave their emeritus churches seemingly to find better terms of restoration elsewhere, and reject denominational policy that their (likely criminal, though now disallowed for criminal court) actions have disqualified them for further church leadership…and claim in a secular, civil court that these actions should NEVER be publicized…indeed that those pastors are due recompense for money lost due to now tainted reputation…then, may God have mercy on our souls! And, I do seriously mean our, because I am NOT without sin.

    If I caused confusion by the verbiage of my earlier post, I sincerely apologize and hope that I have clarified.

Deja una respuesta

El Informe Roys busca fomentar el diálogo reflexivo y respetuoso. Con ese fin, el sitio requiere que las personas se registren antes de comenzar a comentar. Esto significa que no se permitirán comentarios anónimos. Además, se eliminarán todos los comentarios con blasfemias, insultos y/o un tono desagradable.
Artículos MÁS populares


Hola. Vemos que este es el tercer artículo de este mes que ha encontrado que vale la pena leer. ¡Estupendo! ¿Consideraría hacer una donación deducible de impuestos para ayudar a nuestros periodistas a continuar informando la verdad y restaurar la iglesia?

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Give a gift of $30 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Hurt and Healed by the Church” by Ryan George.