Mary
DeMuth

Scot
McKnight

Screenshot 2023-01-13 at 1.50.18 PM

Naghmeh
Panahi

Opinion: Liberty University Unwilling to Confess and Apologize—Again

By Dustin Wahl
petition probation liberty university
Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va. (Photo collage; TRR / Unsplash)

“As soon as we figured out what was wrong, we acknowledged it, and we fixed it.”

That’s what Liberty University President Dondi Costin told Liberty students in response to the historic $14 million fine imposed on Liberty for violating federal campus safety law.

The Department of Education’s report shows that Liberty severely mishandled reports of sexual violence and failed to properly report campus crime information. The fine is the largest ever imposed under the Clery Act.

To be sure, Liberty’s administration ultimately wants its students to be safe. Liberty is in the process of getting into complete compliance with the law, and many staff have a very sincere desire to make things right. But for years, Liberty has prioritized its reputation over safety and compliance with the law. And Costin’s claim that Liberty handled the situation swiftly and properly is blatantly false.

The history that led to this moment matters. And with Liberty’s history in mind, Costin’s posturing sends a signal that despite being one of the world’s largest Christian institutions, Liberty still has no interest in a foundational Christian practice: confessing and asking for forgiveness.

Your tax-deductible gift helps our journalists report the truth and hold Christian leaders and organizations accountable. Give a gift of $30 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you can elect to receive a copy of “When the Church Harms God’s People” by Diane Langberg. To donate, click here.

Liberty University
Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia. (Source: Liberty University)

This is not Liberty’s first time being fined for Clery Act violations. In 2005, a student survivor of sexual violence and her friend pushed the school to make changes to campus safety policy and were ignored. A federal investigation followed in 2010, and Liberty was forced to pay a small fine.

But the school did not address the core problems that led to the investigation. And this allowed the violations that prompted the recent Department of Education investigation.

In other words, Liberty was told what was wrong in 2005, but Liberty did not acknowledge it and did not fix it.

In 2021, a wave of allegations from Jane Does again shed light on Liberty’s failure to adequately handle sexual violence cases. The Jane Does were repeatedly told by administrators that the problem was being dealt with. Meanwhile, many were having trouble even accessing school records about their own cases.

Liberty would go on to offer the Jane Does miniscule four-figure settlements, continuing to avoid direct acknowledgement, and accusing at least one of them of lying about the details of her assault.

Again, Liberty was told what was wrong, but Liberty did not acknowledge it and did not fix it.

As allegations kept coming, Vice President of Communications Scott Lamb was fired after confronting then-President Jerry Prevo over the school’s mishandling of the Jane Doe cases. A lawsuit followed, and Liberty fought aggressively to avoid admitting that Lamb was fired for blowing the whistle.

Scott Lamb Liberty University
Former Liberty University VP of Communications Scott Lamb filed a lawsuit, claiming the university retaliated against him for objecting to its “mishandling” of Title IX sexual misconduct allegations.

Again, Liberty was told what was wrong but did not acknowledge it. Instead, they attacked someone who called them out.

Later that year, I and a student group, called Justice for Janes, held a press conference with survivor advocate and attorney, Rachael Denhollander, and former Liberty professor, Karen Swallow Prior. During the conference, we called for an independent investigation to examine Liberty’s leadership, procedures, and culture across relevant departments and make the results public.

We also announced an event that evening on Liberty’s campus to put pressure on the school, speak to students, and read a letter from the Jane Doe whose 2005 case resulted in the school’s first Clery investigation.

But Liberty’s General Counsel David Corry informed us that we were unwelcome on Liberty’s campus. Ironically, Corry said Liberty students needed protection from our event highlighting campus safety.

“Our students expect Liberty to protect them from unwelcome disruptions to their educational experience from those without official business on campus,” Corry said.

We indicated that we would come to campus anyway. Local reporters followed, despite Liberty’s then-ban on media.

Justice Janes Liberty protest
On November 4, Hailey Wilkinson of Justice for Janes (center) and Dustin Wahl of Save71 speak to Liberty University president Jerry Prevo at a protest outside the school in Lynchburg, Va. (Photo: Robert Locklear for The Roys Report)

So, to avoid the poor optics of a confrontation with campus police, Liberty partially gave in. They told us to gather in one very particular area between the highway and a busy street, because it technically wasn’t Liberty property.

Despite being awkwardly sandwiched between two busy roads and not being able to hear much over the traffic, about 200 students and staff joined us that evening as campus police watched from a distance.

Justice Janes Liberty protest
On November 4, more than 125 students gathered outside Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va. to protest the school’s mishandling of sexual abuse allegations. (Photo: Robert Locklear for The Roys Report)

The following day, Liberty’s Board of Trustees released a statement that vaguely referenced an internal investigation that would help limit further legal liability. The results never became public. School leaders still did not acknowledge any wrongdoing. And they ended the statement by declaring that Liberty had had “a banner year.

Fortunately, the Department of Education investigation, sparked by a separate complaint, was already brewing. Federal investigators would be on campus within a few months, forcing Liberty fix what it refused to even acknowledge.

The results of the investigation are important. Though $14 million is a small fine compared to Liberty’s immense wealth, the unprecedented amount certainly signals to the public that historically, Liberty has failed miserably when it comes to student safety. And the post-review monitoring is crucial to ensure that the school solves the problem this time.

To this day, Liberty has not acknowledged that a rape was reported to them in 2005.

Statement from Jane Doe 2 – originally from Nov. 2021

Liberty-University-Jane-Doe-2-statement

This opinion article does not necessarily reflect the views of The Roys Report. 

Dustin Wahl is the co-founder of Save71, an organization to promote accountability at his alma mater, Liberty University. 

SHARE THIS:

GET EMAIL UPDATES!

Keep in touch with Julie and get updates in your inbox!

Don’t worry we won’t spam you.

More to explore
discussion

6 Responses

  1. And in honor of Liberty University’s proud tradition of blaming and silencing the victims, lying, using delay tactics, misdirection, and DARVO to avoid responsibility, they will have Donald “Grab Em by the _____” Trump give the Spring 2024 Commencement Address. I understand Jerry Falwell, Jr. will not attend, but will be watching the festivities.

  2. They could have fixed this back 2010 but didn’t. Wow. God gave them a warning through that fine, but egos. No Romans 12:16 on that campus! Now verse 19 has come to their campus and I don’t feel one bit sorry for them. Only sorry for the sheep who enroll there and the parents who encourage it, sticking their heads in the sand.

  3. Why would any parent send a student to that school? A parent of a daughter should be ashamed for indoctrinating your child to believe that she is a second class citizen and does not deserve equal respect in all arenas of life. All people who contribute money to that place, and the places who operate in such blatant moral bankruptcy, should ask for forgiveness and STOP contributing.

  4. “The last thing I was told by a top tier Liberty administrator regarding my assault before I finally chose to transfer, was that Liberty University was the safest school on the east coast, no changes to improve campus safety were going to be made, and if I didn’t like it, I could leave. I was told that Liberty was not going to have students like myself trying to “run the administration”. Instead of seeing my pleas for help as an opportunity to improve what was clearly broken, THEY SAW THEM AS A THREAT TO PUBLIC PERCEPTION-TO THE BRAND. THEY SAW THEIR IMAGE AS THE MOST PRECIOUS THING TO BE GUARDED, not the students they were entrusted with. I was welcome to stay if I stayed silent. So, I left.”
    In all but the rarest of circumstances, this is the modus operandi of Evangelical Churches™ in America. They are businesses with something to sell, and it’s not Jesus. They are out to sell membership in their own particular brand and NOTHING can be allowed to interfere with their public image, as that might forewarn and scare off potential recruits (and cash flow). Liberty U, the SBC, IHOPKC, Ravi Zacharias International Ministries, The Assemblies of God with Chi Alpha, Association of Related Churches and on and on ad nauseam, have prioritized PUBLIC IMAGE above all, and always. We read about this in Julie’s blog almost daily. The corruption and rot in Evangelicalism today is breathtaking.

Leave a Reply

The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people register before they begin commenting. This means no anonymous comments will be allowed. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.
 
MOST RECENT Articles
MOST popular articles
en_USEnglish

Don't miss our next breaking story!

Sign up for updates now 

Don’t worry we won’t spam you.