In the wake of allegations that Moody Bible Institute (MBI) is drifting theologically, the institute has consistently maintained that there is no drift, and that all its faculty are faithful to “Moody’s stated beliefs and mission.”
Yet according to a lawsuit filed last week, Moody knowingly hired a woman who’s an ordained minister to teach at the school in clear violation of the institute’s doctrinal statement, which says the “biblical office of elder/pastor” should be “limited to the male gender.” What’s more, the lawsuit alleges that a “vice president and associate provost” reportedly asked this professor – Janay Garrick – to remove references to her ordination from her resume, seemingly trying to hide this fact from those who might take exception.
“Administrators – from vice presidents to the provost and president – regularly looked the other way when faculty members reported that a colleague was straying from the doctrinal statement.”
I take no joy in bringing MBI’s institutional malpractice to light, but am doing so for three reasons.
One, the MBI board of trustees has failed to explain why it removed the institute’s top three officers, creating a vacuum that has allowed false rumors to flourish. Alumni, supporters, faculty, employees, and students have a right to know the truth.
Give a gift of $30 or more to The Roys Report this month, and you will receive a copy of “Wounded Workers: Recovering from Heartache in the Workplace and the Church” by Kirk Farnsworth. To donate, click here.
Two, though the trustees removed the president, provost, and COO of Moody, they have allowed vice presidents and deans, who have similarly betrayed the mission of the institute, to remain.
And three, some of the faculty who regularly confronted the administration with theological concerns are being let go at the end of spring semester, and some believe their removal is an act of retaliation. MBI needs to suspend these layoffs until the institute can determine that retaliation played no role.
Professor Janay Garrick
Why MBI hired Janay Garrick, a woman who’s an ordained minister, to teach at the institute is baffling. I emailed Dr. Larry Davidhizar, MBI vice president and associate provost, as well as Bryan O’Neal, vice president and dean of MBI Distance Learning, for comment, but they did not respond.
“‘I am egalitarian,’ I said to the seven program heads and vice presidents/deans of education, including one woman. I don’t think you can be much more clear than that.”
Reportedly, Garrick’s opposition to the doctrinal statement didn’t faze administrators. One later told Garrick that they were willing to overlook it because she “brought things to the table.”
However, Garrick’s relationship with Moody reportedly soured in 2016 when she helped a female student bring a Title IX complaint against the school for excluding women from its pastoral ministry major. Since 2012, MBI has been receiving student financial aid from the U.S. Government, making the institute subject to Title IX requirements, which prohibit sex-based discrimination. As a result of the complaint, the institute changed its policy and began allowing women into its pastoral ministry major. (This acceptance of government money and control is another troubling development at Moody, but that’s beyond the purview of this article.)
Garrick alleges that MBI administrators then conspired to fire her by falsifying her performance evaluation. When that didn’t work, Garrick says administrators moved to plan B – firing her because she held to “the egalitarian view,” which the institute had previously been happy to overlook. Garrick said she tried to pursue justice internally by invoking the internal grievance procedure at MBI, but “encountered corrupt institutional power” at every turn.
Given what I’ve learned about the administration at MBI, nothing in Garrick’s account surprises me – and it shouldn’t surprise MBI trustees either. Contained in a 65-page document that Theology Professor Rich Weber submitted to trustees in December are similar accounts, showing disregard on the part of the administration for the institute’s doctrinal statement, as well as deceptive practices. Sadly, the trustees continue to withhold this information from the public, so I feel compelled to disclose it here.
Administrators Oppose Profs Who Report Drift
As I recently reported, two vice presidents failed to do anything when two professors at MBI revealed that they hold a view of truth seemingly at odds with the historic, evangelical understanding of biblical inerrancy. Then, when Professor Rich Weber appealed to then-President Paul Nyquist to clarify the institute’s stance, Nyquist skirted the question, leaving serious questions as to where MBI stands.
Similarly, Moody Theology Professor Kevin Zuber told me that he appealed to a Moody dean after hearing audio of a sermon by a colleague promoting a social gospel, seemingly negating the importance of personal conversion and evangelism. According to Zuber, the dean didn’t seem to take the complaint seriously, but dismissed it after talking with the professor, who appeared unchanged.
But these incidents are just the tip of the iceberg.
Weber told me that on another occasion, Associate Provost Larry Davidhizar intentionally attempted to hide the fact that a theology professor had expressed to students that the human race had evolved from a sub-human race of hominids. This view appears to contradict the MBI doctrinal statement, which states that “the first human beings were a special and unique creation by God as contrasted to being derived from any pre-existing life forms.”
Weber learned of this professor’s view when a student taking an online Moody Distance Learning course approached him in church and expressed concerns about his online professor’s view of human origins and showed Weber an email from the professor.
“I had a bigger concern concerning the doctrinal integrity of our school and regarding faithfulness to Scripture as a whole. Parents are sending their students to Moody with the expectation that Moody is going to support what its doctrinal statement says.”
At this point, Weber said he felt compelled to take the matter to MBI administrators. “I didn’t want to attack a colleague,” he said, “but I had a bigger concern concerning the doctrinal integrity of our school and regarding faithfulness to Scripture as a whole. Parents are sending their students to Moody with the expectation that Moody is going to support what its doctrinal statement says. We’ve got a professor teaching something that’s contrary to that. I feel like that’s disingenuous of us, and it’s unfair to the parents who are trusting us.”
Weber showed the email to Davidhizar, who reportedly had been alerted to this professor’s view several months earlier by three other faculty. Weber said all three had told both O’Neal and Davidhizar that they had overheard this professor tell students that based on the findings of the Human Genome Project, he believed a pool of 10,000 hominids were the progenitors of human beings.
O’Neal and Davidhizar reportedly dropped the matter after a private conversation with the professor. Weber said the three professors requested a follow-up discussion with the professor and deans, but O’Neal and Davidhizar refused.
Davidhizar reportedly told Weber that the professor had argued that his view on human origins, when properly interpreted, fit with MBI’s doctrinal statement. Weber objected, saying that President Nyquist and the trustees should determine whether the professor’s view fits. He then asked Davidhizar to take the matter to Nyquist and the trustee board, but Davidhizar refused. He said if he did so, the president might fire the professor.
“I was shocked about this attempt to hide the facts from the president, rather than address a significant concern about a faculty member’s disagreement with MBI’s doctrine,”
Days later, Weber expressed his concern to John Jelinek, vice president and dean of Moody Theological Seminary and Graduate school, and currently the interim provost. Jelinek shared Weber’s concern and said the matter should be reviewed by the Provost’s Cabinet.
Shortly after this discussion, President Nyquist issued a clarifying statement affirming MBI’s position that the entire human race descended from Adam and Eve – a view that clearly conflicted with the professor’s written views. Weber asked Davidhizar about the apparent conflict, and Davidhizar said the professor had changed his position and it now fit with MBI’s view.
Today, I am relatively confident that this professor is no longer teaching something contrary to MBI’s stated doctrine. However, I am not confident that the administration will act appropriately when faced with a similar challenge.
Clearly, the faculty who care about doctrinal integrity face an uphill battle when they report theological drift at the institute. What’s worse, as I reported in a previous article, professors often feel like the administration views them as “suspect” after bringing concerns, and some faculty have even been reprimanded for doing so. Sadly, a number of the more than 30 professors being let go at the end of spring semester believe they were singled out for elimination because they spoke up. Godly leadership would welcome and thank those who defend right doctrine; unfortunately, the opposite appears to be happening right now at Moody.
63 thoughts on “MBI Administrators Fail to Uphold Doctrine: Hire, Then Fire Female Pastor/Oppose Profs Who Report Drift”
Nice Job Julie. Zero tolerance is the rule. It’s the least we can endeavor to provide given what Christ did for each of us. MBI is God’s institution, his torch burns there. Unfortunately, people forget that and corruption sets in. Clearly, MBI has been slowly leaking air like a tire that picked up a nail. Eventually, that nail needs removed and a plug or new tire is required to provide the long term stability needed to carry on. Someone has to have the courage to say “we got a slow leak here” and the nearest service station is 400 miles… The ONLY relationship that counts is the one with Christ, get that right and the rest follows beautifully. Get it wrong, and one sits in turmoil and chaos he or she created.
My family has a long history with Moody. My father, G. Coleman Luck, was a professor there as was my brother. My wife and I both attended the school and for several years I was on the radio staff as Supervisor of Production and Talent. We care about Moody. Literally, I grew up there, visiting my father’s classes when I was a child. There have been serious problems brewing at the school for a long time. Over the course of my life, I have discovered that many, many Christians absolutely hate to be confronted with the truth about their chosen leaders. So often their response is to attack those who speak the truth and always they do it in a smarmy, pseudo-spiritual tone designed to create guilt. Out of my own experience, I wrote a book, Day of the Wolf: Unmasking and Confronting Wolves in the Church. Do not be discouraged by the attacks you are receiving. It means you are doing something right. Because of that, you are worthy to be attacked. Satan does not waste resources and he uses Christians whenever he can.
Coleman Luck, Jr.
The theme for the Moody Missions Conference 2017 was “H.E.R. Honor Empower Release” which was designed to “honor and celebrate the legacy and promise of Moody women”. The keynote, Carolyn Custis James, had extensively written about and promoted egalitarian views.
See her own review of the conference at https://carolyncustisjames.com/2017/10/26/moody-takes-the-lead-again/
Her books include _Malestrom: Manhood Swept into the Currents of a Changing World_ and also _Half the Church_.
If there is any doubt about the content of Carolyn Custis James’ address to the Moody students, she expresses her intentions to discuss her piece called “The Blessed Alliance” here https://carolyncustisjames.com/2017/10/09/behind-every-great-man-is-a-woman/
where she says “So this Monday, October 9, I’m heading for Chicago where I’ll be speaking on the Blessed Alliance https://carolyncustisjames.com/2012/09/18/the-blessed-alliance/ at MBI’s 2017 Missions Conference.
It is important to make distinctions. It’s one thing to loosen up on old rigidities (such as a faculty member having a glass of wine with dinner) or to discuss whether the church has interpreted certain passages well and quite another thing to allow anti-Christian ideologies popular in politically correct secular society to be taught as OK and to pretend that doing so is not problematic.
It seems like what MBI leadership values most is staff who walk in lock step with them and do not engage in correction or rebuke when they do something wrong, people who do not rock the boat. It seems they value this even more than their own doctrinal standards. They seem to value their own authority more than God’s. Moody’s doctrinal standards did not stop Garrick from getting fired. But when she rocked the boat she got fired. Julie Roys did nothing wrong and did not veer from Moody’s doctrinal standards. She rocked the boat and she got fired. And what of all the other staff/faculty who veer from Moody’s standards and have safe employment, but the many others who called Moody to account and do not have safe employment? It’s sad to see such worldliness taking over Moody.
*doctrinal standards did not stop..from getting**hired…
“Part 1” was removed from the title…?
Why were yiy pulled as the key note speaker from Harvest bible chapels MUCH MORE conference
It concerned my reporting on Moody, but I don’t want to speak for them. I encourage you to contact the conference organizers directly.
” Moody knowingly hired a woman who’s an ordained minister to teach at the school in clear violation of the institute’s doctrinal statement, which says the “biblical office of elder/pastor” should be “limited to the male gender.”
She cud have been hired to teach women. I see not Bible restriction on women preaching or teaching outside of the church & so long as it is not teaching men. I know of no reason why women could not have the gift of teachers; older women are to teach the younger to be fond of (not “love”) husbands. Evangelicals are split on women’s role, so it is not surprising that a non-denominational evangelical schools wud have faculty who saw no restrictions on women’s role. But I commend MBI for its stand.
On the other hand, “pastor” is not called an office. It is a rare NT word used only in Eph 4 in combo “pastors and teachers.” The functions of elder & pastor appear to be identical, except that pastor-teacher is a spiritual gift which may not be lost, yet elders/bishops must meet qualifications to serve. So consider that a man might have the gift to be pastor, but not qualified because of behavior to be an elder. By rare word, I mean when it designates a mere Christian man with a gift, as opposed to a literal shepherd of sheep or the Lord Jesus, who is the great pastor/shepherd; cf 1 Peter 5. Some may argue that while a woman may be a pastor, she cannot be an elder (not husband of one wife), & serve as a pastor over women — but this is alien to scripture.
Problem is how non PC this is. Time may come when you cannot be an accredited college with this POV. MBI might have to go back to being an unaccredited Bible Institute. But would that really be so bad?
– X-MBI Professor (not famous)
The Roys Report seeks to foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue. Toward that end, the site requires that people use their full name when commenting. Also, any comments with profanity, name-calling, and/or a nasty tone will be deleted.
Comments are limited to 300 words.